Hi ,
Just working on unix controllers are now allowed on ovs 1.8 branch.
Can some one explain how i can use them to add flows nd all openflow
activities.
Like we set ovs-vsctl tcp::, how i can set remote primary
unix controller??
Selen
___
discuss mai
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:54:42PM +0100, Martin Mailand wrote:
> I tried to use Openvswitch to bond to interface together. The setup
> should use the aktiv/passiv bond modus (mode 1).
> But if I pull eth0 I lose connection to the machine, there is no
> failover. If I pull eht1 connection stay avai
Hi List,
I tried to use Openvswitch to bond to interface together. The setup
should use the aktiv/passiv bond modus (mode 1).
But if I pull eth0 I lose connection to the machine, there is no
failover. If I pull eht1 connection stay available.
I configured ovs like this. What do I do wrong?
ovs-v
Thanks for your help, but now I have a new question.
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:49:01 -0800
> From: b...@nicira.com
> To: rgg...@hotmail.com
> CC: discuss@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] FW: Doubt about somes command's
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 07:51:25PM +, Rafael Gomes wro
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I drop hardware Layer 2 switching entirely, and route traffic directly
> from the hypervisor/ospf ?
>
> I'm trying to eliminate STP, utilize multiple links, avoid downtime during
> upgrade of switch-stack etc I was wonder
Hi,
Could I drop hardware Layer 2 switching entirely, and route traffic directly
from the hypervisor/ospf ?
I'm trying to eliminate STP, utilize multiple links, avoid downtime during
upgrade of switch-stack etc I was wondering if the following would be possible:
Uplink Uplink
|
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:01 PM, john paul wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have one question that in the OVS when i am adding bridge and some
> ports under it at what speed packets will transferred to that port from the
> bridge or the speed of transfer between the ports and bridge depends upon
> what i