Re: [ovs-discuss] (no subject)

2013-02-04 Thread Justin Pettit
On Feb 4, 2013, at 8:28 PM, john paul wrote: > Currently I am using Openvswitch-1.7.0 ,which version should i used to test > the flags for add-port command,and in that I am not able to understand about > the column[key]=value field. The "Port Configuration" section of the ovs-vsctl man page ha

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS Bonding using 2 USB Wireless Interfaces

2013-02-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
I doubt whether the MAC address of the bond interfaces is important. Rather, I think that the source MAC address of the packets transmitted over the bond is the important issue. This means that you would have to rewrite the MAC addresses on the packets transmitted over the bond. On Tue, Feb 05, 2

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS Bonding using 2 USB Wireless Interfaces

2013-02-04 Thread Yuris Mulya Saputra
It means that can I make bonding with 2 wireless interfaces with same MAC address? On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:11:52PM +0900, Yuris Mulya Saputra wrote: > > I have a problem to make OVS bonding using 2 Wireless interfaces as AP or > > master mod

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS Bonding using 2 USB Wireless Interfaces

2013-02-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:11:52PM +0900, Yuris Mulya Saputra wrote: > I have a problem to make OVS bonding using 2 Wireless interfaces as AP or > master mode (from 2 APs to 1 AP). > First I make a bridge as usual and then make bonding with 2 wireless > interface. But when I make bonding, the inter

[ovs-discuss] OVS Bonding using 2 USB Wireless Interfaces

2013-02-04 Thread Yuris Mulya Saputra
Hi All, I have a problem to make OVS bonding using 2 Wireless interfaces as AP or master mode (from 2 APs to 1 AP). First I make a bridge as usual and then make bonding with 2 wireless interface. But when I make bonding, the internet is diconnected for the client. My 2 APs have different MAC addre

Re: [ovs-discuss] (no subject)

2013-02-04 Thread john paul
Thank you, Currently I am using Openvswitch-1.7.0 ,which version should i used to test the flags for add-port command,and in that I am not able to understand about the column[key]=value field. On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Justin Pettit wrote: > Try adding "--" after "ovs-vsctl". We relaxed

Re: [ovs-discuss] (no subject)

2013-02-04 Thread Justin Pettit
Try adding "--" after "ovs-vsctl". We relaxed this restriction in later versions. --Justin On Feb 4, 2013, at 7:19 PM, john paul wrote: > Hello, > >I am trying to add flags like --may-exist when adding a bridge > with the same name > i used instruction like this > > ovs-vsctl

[ovs-discuss] (no subject)

2013-02-04 Thread john paul
Hello, I am trying to add flags like --may-exist when adding a bridge with the same name i used instruction like this ovs-vsctl add-br br0 ovs-vsctl add-port br eth0 ovs-vsctl --may-exist add-br br0 then it will send me an error that unrecognised option i check the value of flage

Re: [ovs-discuss] Build openvswitch module with realtime patch set (kernel 3.2.0)

2013-02-04 Thread Jesse Gross
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Squiddo wrote: > I'm looking at using openvswitch with the realtime patch set - should > I be using the userspace version? I've had trouble getting the kernel > module to compile -- the rt patches change skbuff.h and other includes > that mess up the configure scrip

Re: [ovs-discuss] NetFlow in openvswitch

2013-02-04 Thread Peter Phaal
What are your requirements for NetFlow version 9? If you are need visibility into non-IPv4 traffic (mac addresses, IPv6 addresses, FCoE, AoE etc) then you might want to look at OVS sFlow: http://blog.sflow.com/2011/10/comparing-sflow-and-netflow-in-vswitch.html If you are interested in using f

Re: [ovs-discuss] NetFlow in openvswitch

2013-02-04 Thread Fernando Farias
You can use nprobe linux Enviado pelo meu Windows Phone De: Ben Pfaff Enviada em: 04/02/2013 14:08 Para: nirmoy das Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org Assunto: Re: [ovs-discuss] NetFlow in openvswitch On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:43:09PM +0530, nirmoy das wrote: > Can open vswitch support netflow version

Re: [ovs-discuss] NetFlow in openvswitch

2013-02-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:43:09PM +0530, nirmoy das wrote: > Can open vswitch support netflow version 9? Open vSwitch does not support NetFlow version 9, but it can, if you contribute support. ___ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://ope

Re: [ovs-discuss] TTL of ipv4 packet

2013-02-04 Thread Justin Pettit
Yes. Your question was about ovs-ofctl. OVS 1.7.1 only supports OpenFlow 1.0 plus Nicira extensions. OpenFlow 1.0 isn't aware of TTL, so you need to use an extension. The forthcoming 1.10.0 release of OVS will have support for later versions of OpenFlow, which do support TTL, and they'll use

Re: [ovs-discuss] TTL of ipv4 packet

2013-02-04 Thread selen jia
Hi, I think this action is of NIcira ext. On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Justin Pettit wrote: > As documented in ovs-ofctl, you can use "dec_ttl" to decrement the TTL. > > --Justin > > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 12:56 AM, selen jia wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am able to match Ipv4 TTL field using nw_

Re: [ovs-discuss] TTL of ipv4 packet

2013-02-04 Thread Justin Pettit
As documented in ovs-ofctl, you can use "dec_ttl" to decrement the TTL. --Justin On Feb 4, 2013, at 12:56 AM, selen jia wrote: > Hi, > > I am able to match Ipv4 TTL field using nw_ttl in ovs-ofctl in 1.7.1 branch, > but how can i modify TTL of ipv4 packet. > > Please help. > > Selen > ___

[ovs-discuss] TTL of ipv4 packet

2013-02-04 Thread selen jia
Hi, I am able to match Ipv4 TTL field using *nw_ttl* in *ovs-ofctl in 1.7.1*branch, but how can i *modify TTL* of ipv4 packet. Please help. Selen ___ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[ovs-discuss] How to automatically tag VLAN's to target device

2013-02-04 Thread Pradeep Kumar
Title: Ericsson Signature Hi I have a Query regarding Openvswitch implementation vide , creation of a Internal Network in a Hypervisor(Physical Server) , My environment : Centos6.2 Openvswitch 1.7 version I want to implement a solution wher