On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:24:04AM +0400, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
>> 1. RTNETLINK answers: File exists.
>> My suggestion was based on this thread:
>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/rtnetlink-answers-file-exists-542525/
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:08:50PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Eugene Istomin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > the problem stays the same with ovs kernel module:
> >
> >
> >
> > modinfo openvswitch
> >
> > filename: /lib/modules/3.4.15-1-xen/updates/openvswitch.k
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Eugene Istomin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> the problem stays the same with ovs kernel module:
>
>
>
> modinfo openvswitch
>
> filename: /lib/modules/3.4.15-1-xen/updates/openvswitch.ko
>
> license: GPL
>
> description: Open vSwitch switching datapath
>
> srcversion: 8
Thank you for reply.
Unfortunately that staff happens be in product environment with >
200Mb/s outgoing trafic from virtual machines (XCP 1.1 with upgrade to
ovs1.4.3), so tcpdump is kinda impossible.
Some data on configuration:
no flow controller, some rules (antispoofing) are applied during
The sFlow reported utilization numbers should be accurate for the physical
NICs.
There is no well defined link capacity for a vNIC and so the utilization
numbers are meaningless (I believe the Open vSwitch sFlow implementation
reports a nominal 100Mbits/s capacity for vNICs). When examining v
Hello,
the problem stays the same with ovs kernel module:
modinfo openvswitch
filename: /lib/modules/3.4.15-1-xen/updates/openvswitch.ko
license:GPL
description:Open vSwitch switching datapath
srcversion: 85CBAC03B121BA9E19165EC
depends:
vermagic: 3.4.15-1-xen
hello, I want to ask, why the sFlow flow statistics from interface counter
value reaches a high number (frame / s) and why the presentation interface
utilization exceeds 100%? this happens when I'm doing port scanning inter-VM
measurements, thanks
___
Hmm. Yesterday I looked over all of the datapath commits since version
1.4.3 and didn't see any bugfixes, not applied to branch-1.4, that would
account for this particular message. That means that this may be a
problem that we aren't yet aware of.
Unfortunately, this particular class of issue is
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:24:04AM +0400, Denis Iskandarov wrote:
> 1. RTNETLINK answers: File exists.
> My suggestion was based on this thread:
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/rtnetlink-answers-file-exists-542525/
That page is pretty incoherent. I would suggest diggi
1. RTNETLINK answers: File exists.
My suggestion was based on this thread:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/rtnetlink-answers-file-exists-542525/
So you are saying that in usual simplest setup this "error" doesn't exist?
With ovs 1.7.1, CentOS6.3x64 - who approve or refute
10 matches
Mail list logo