On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:40:05PM +0200, Robin Haberkorn wrote:
> regarding test-openflowd vs. ovs-vswitchd:
> we may eventually migrate to ovs-vswitchd but this introduces
> some new problems related to its configuration via a stand-alone
> database.
> I think it does makes sense for remote confi
hi ben!
seems that exactly this was the problem, even though we
didn't explicitly use NORMAL processing, we unnecessarily
started the daemon in in-band control mode (which is the default).
while on the first start this didn't seem to cause any problems,
after restarts, some hidden flows for ARP-h
Hello,
We're currently experimenting with open-vswitch, planning to use it as
replacement for vconfig/bridges in a debian/xen environment.
The primary goal we're looking for is to cleanup the numerous bridges
and interfaces in vm's when working with a whole bunch of vlans,
replacing them by
