On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:37 PM, el05682 wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:56:06 -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:46 PM, el05682 wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanx for the quick reply. Got that, but I still haven't solved my
>>> problem
>>> though.
>>>
>>> Is there any way to group the p
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:33 PM, el05682 wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I am running a linux box with 2.6.32-32-server and
> I want to connect an physical ethernet interface (eth2):
> driver: e1000
> version: 7.3.21-k5-NAPI
> firmware-version: N/A
> bus-info: :02:03.0
>
> I am sending packets to a tru
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:56:06 -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:46 PM, el05682
wrote:
Thanx for the quick reply. Got that, but I still haven't solved my
problem
though.
Is there any way to group the packet flow without sacrificing the L2
lookup?
I think that the flows to mul
Hi again,
I am running a linux box with 2.6.32-32-server and
I want to connect an physical ethernet interface (eth2):
driver: e1000
version: 7.3.21-k5-NAPI
firmware-version: N/A
bus-info: :02:03.0
I am sending packets to a trunk port in and openvswitch v1.1.1 bridge.
Packets created from a v
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:46 PM, el05682 wrote:
> Thanx for the quick reply. Got that, but I still haven't solved my problem
> though.
>
> Is there any way to group the packet flow without sacrificing the L2 lookup?
> I think that the flows to multiple ports (i.e. ovs-ofctl add-flow br0
> in_port=
Thanx for the quick reply. Got that, but I still haven't solved my
problem though.
Is there any way to group the packet flow without sacrificing the L2
lookup?
I think that the flows to multiple ports (i.e. ovs-ofctl add-flow br0
in_port=3,actions=output:1,2)
skip this lookup.
I was thinking
I've been following the libvirt mailing list for a few days now, but
the discussion of Open vSwitch seems to have more or less died out.
I've only seen a couple of messages about a new network model, which
were focused on migration, and no patches yet.
__
