On 10/18/2010 01:00 PM, Derek Cormier wrote:
On 10/18/2010 11:11 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Derek Cormier
wrote:
On 10/18/2010 09:36 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Derek Cormier wrote:
When you add ports to a virtual bridge, should you st
On 10/18/2010 11:11 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Derek Cormier
wrote:
On 10/18/2010 09:36 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Derek Cormier wrote:
When you add ports to a virtual bridge, should you still be able to ping
them? F
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Derek Cormier
wrote:
> On 10/18/2010 09:36 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Derek Cormier wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> When you add ports to a virtual bridge, should you still be able to ping
>>> them? For some reason, I cannot ping the interface
On 10/18/2010 09:36 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Derek Cormier wrote:
When you add ports to a virtual bridge, should you still be able to ping them?
For some reason, I cannot ping the interface on the switch that a host connects
to. Yet, I can ping another host.
On Oct 17, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Derek Cormier wrote:
> When you add ports to a virtual bridge, should you still be able to ping
> them? For some reason, I cannot ping the interface on the switch that a host
> connects to. Yet, I can ping another host.
Do you mean, for example, if you add eth0 to b
When you add ports to a virtual bridge, should you still be able to ping
them? For some reason, I cannot ping the interface on the switch that a
host connects to. Yet, I can ping another host.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://op
