Thanks so much. I think I see the real problem now. Could you
re-enable the call to bond_wait(br), and then make a different change?
Here it is:
diff --git a/vswitchd/bridge.c b/vswitchd/bridge.c
index 476073a..4c9b019 100644
--- a/vswitchd/bridge.c
+++ b/vswitchd/bridge.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ st
Perfect !!
Commenting out the bond_wait(br) solved this high CPU.
If you need more debuging and testing, be my guest.
Regards,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> There's nothing unusual there. Hmm.
>
> If you're willing to try some experiments, maybe we can learn more.
>
> F
There's nothing unusual there. Hmm.
If you're willing to try some experiments, maybe we can learn more.
First, try commenting out the call to "bond_wait(br)" in bridge_wait()
in vswitchd/bridge.c. Does that have any effect?
If that has no effect, then try commenting out the call to
poll_timer_
Note that XenServer 5.6 does not have the openvswitch enabled by default; it
uses linux bridging. That might explain what you are seeing.
To enable the openvswitch in XenServer, you can do something like this:
$ echo openvswitch > /etc/xensource/network.conf && chkconfig openvswitch on &&
reboot
# ovs-appctl bond/show bond0
updelay: 200 ms
downdelay: 0 ms
next rebalance: 8481 ms
slave eth3: enabled
active slave
hash 218: 5 kB load
00:23:7d:e8:2a:00
slave eth2: enabled
# ovs-appctl bond/show bond1
updelay: 200 ms
downdelay: 0 ms
next rebalance: 9737 ms
slave
Here goes:
May 16 21:56:39|14629|poll_loop|DBG|0-ms timeout: 0x805bac1(bridge_wait)
0x8063da9(main) 0xb7470e9c
May 16 21:56:39|14630|poll_loop|DBG|0-ms timeout: 0x805bac1(bridge_wait)
0x8063da9(main) 0xb7470e9c
May 16 21:56:39|14631|poll_loop|DBG|0-ms timeout: 0x805bac1(bridge_wait)
0x8063da9(main)
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:59:35PM -0300, Luiz Henrique Ozaki wrote:
> May 16 21:56:39|14629|poll_loop|DBG|0-ms timeout: 0x805bac1(bridge_wait)
> 0x8063da9(main) 0xb7470e9c
Thanks. It's definitely part of the bridge code then. What does
"ovs-appctl bond/show ", with replaced by the name
of the
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:03:16PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:53:05PM -0300, Luiz Henrique Ozaki wrote:
> > I'm trying to create a bond interface with OpenvSwitch in a XenServer 5.6
> > and I'm getting a high load CPU for the ovs-vswitchd, but It's working
> > apparently.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:53:05PM -0300, Luiz Henrique Ozaki wrote:
> I'm trying to create a bond interface with OpenvSwitch in a XenServer 5.6
> and I'm getting a high load CPU for the ovs-vswitchd, but It's working
> apparently.
Hi Luiz. This shouldn't happen.
When the vswitch is in this high
Hi,
I'm trying to create a bond interface with OpenvSwitch in a XenServer 5.6
and I'm getting a high load CPU for the ovs-vswitchd, but It's working
apparently.
Doing a strace in the process I'm getting:
ioctl(24, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="bond0",
ifr_flags=IFF_UP|IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_RUNNING|IF
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:38:10AM +0800, 楊皓中(Mulder Yang) wrote:
> Why Xen or ovs can not see the networks that created by another
> software?
>
> I mean Xen can not see the bridge that ovs created or ovs can not see
> the vif that Xen created?
I do not understand your question.
What did you do
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:28:58PM +0200, Michael Stegk wrote:
> I have installed the openvswitch kernelmodule on debian with xen .
> I have Problems setting up a mirror Port on OpenvSwitch.
> Here is what i try:
>
> $ovs-vsctl list port
> ...
> _uuid : a7fd3df2-d7bf-4a92-8133-22d9e
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:27:40AM +0100, Richard Mortier wrote:
> this may be a FAQ in which case i apologise (i have done some googling
> but couldn't find an answer). here goes:
>
> what's the difference between "ovs-ofctl dump-flows dp0" and
> "ovs-dpctl dump-flows dp0"?
>
> ...where dp0 is
hi;
this may be a FAQ in which case i apologise (i have done some googling
but couldn't find an answer). here goes:
what's the difference between "ovs-ofctl dump-flows dp0" and
"ovs-dpctl dump-flows dp0"?
...where dp0 is a datapath with a single interface, eth0, added to it.
they appear to giv
14 matches
Mail list logo
