iting from my phone, so sorry for not
providibg some relevant links, myself) - and maybe it'd become more
obvious how the 'facebook' is only a component of a broader
cooperative capability, bringing the mailing lists and usenet groups
(oh, tempora!) type of communication to new l
I am looking into alternatives for expense management in the telecom
area (a.k.a. TEM), inclusive of savings-contingent fee offerings. Does
anybody have any experience with such?
TIA,
Stefan
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org
I like http://gmane.org/ (my goto place, even for those maintaining
their own archives)
and they seem to have the software available for download:
http://gmane.org/dist.php
HTH
--
***Stefan
http://twitter.com/netfortius
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Christophe Kalt wrote:
> Hi
e appropriate lists, also.
TIA,
Stefan
--
Sent from my mobile device
***Stefan
http://twitter.com/netfortius
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional Sy
Fairly recent:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/test-center-e-mail-security-services-square-989
***Stefan Mititelu
http://twitter.com/netfortius
http://www.linkedin.com/in/netfortius
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Rob Cherry wrote:
> I am being asked by the business to d
Have you looked at: http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/ ? It also works under
wine...
***Stefan Mititelu
http://twitter.com/netfortius
http://www.linkedin.com/in/netfortius
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tracy Reed wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 01:34:43PM -0700, Atom Powers spake thu
wer your
question by saying that "it depends" completely on what you are supporting
... and here is where I would start:
http://www.netqos.com/resourceroom/whitepapers/forms/handbook.html
***Stefan Mititelu
http://twitter.com/netfortius
http://www.linkedin.com/in/netfortius
On Tue,
+ consider PoE
--
*** Sent from my Nokia N900
- Original message -
> Tom Limoncelli wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Atom Powers wrote:
> >
> > > Because I'm not planning to pull new CAT5 to those offices. They
> > > already have 2x CAT5 and 2x CAT3. While I only /need/ two r