Edward> For what it's worth, I am not very inclined toward 7000 "amber
Edward> road." I am more inclined toward a normal solaris server with
Edward> ZFS, NFS, and Samba.
I've been meaning to reply to this, and since I just went through a
Netapp vs. Sun 7x00 series storage evaluation (not as inde
Nick> On 4/15/09 12:52 PM, John Stoffel wrote:
>> 1) 16G limit on Aggregates. This is the biggest complaint from NetApp
>> users, since it's make building big volumes a total pain in the
>> ass. And if you have volumes that grow/shrink, it makes balancing
>> t
>> On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:30 AM, Trever Miller wrote:
>>
>>> After kicking the switches around a bit, the next step looks like it
>>> will be clonezilla investigation. Where's the coffee...
>>
>> I was going to suggest that. We are using Cobbler for systems mgmt
>> & the pxe & DHCP side, and
Rob> I am working on a brand new IT room for around 4 high (12kw?)
Rob> power racks and 2 wiring racks. I was talking to the obvious
Rob> choice - Liebert - and they came back with a fairly eye watering
Rob> quote that made me question whether they are the only game in
Rob> town. During my resea
> "Adam" == Adam Levin writes:
Adam> Our group is an architecture group, and we're poking into data
Adam> center consolidation and enterprise NAS.
Fun!
Adam> We've obviously got NetApp and Celerra on the list, as well as
Adam> Isilon coming in to talk to us. Can anyone suggest other
Adam>
Edward> Never delete user accounts. Just disable them. For precisely
Edward> the reason mentioned - after a user account is deleted,
Edward> whether Windows or Linux fileshare, the system says "I don't
Edward> know who owns those files..."
We don't delete them right away, but we do ask their ma
>>>>> "david" == david writes:
david> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, John Stoffel wrote:
Edward> Never delete user accounts. Just disable them. For precisely
Edward> the reason mentioned - after a user account is deleted,
Edward> whether Windows or Linux fileshare,
> "David" == David Parter writes:
>> I personally think this scales down to even a small company. And
>> please, let's get away from those asinine first.last@ email
>> addresses. They just don't scale. But god knows why some CEOs
>> continue to insist on them, like my current job. Stupid.
>> And
>> please, let's get away from those asinine first.last@ email
>> addresses. They just don't scale.
Edward> I don't get what you're talking about. first.l...@domain is
Edward> one of the best things ever. When I meet somebody, I don't
Edward> want to remember that they are jsmith, or
> "Edward" == Edward Ned Harvey writes:
>> So any stardard is going to break no matter what you do. Which is why
>> I liked the Lucent one. There was no standard name, which meant no
>> standard expecations to break.
Edward> The only thing I didn't like about the lucent one was ... at
Edwa
> "bergman" == bergman writes:
bergman> I'm adding a new storage device to our SAN, and this is a
bergman> good opportunity to reexamine our config and make
bergman> changes. I'm looking for recommendation about storage
bergman> configuration decisions.
bergman>RHCS-clustered Linux
Adam> If you have enough money to play with, you might want to look
Adam> into NetApp's FlexCache setup -- a filer at home with the
Adam> primary data, and another head with some disk remotely to cache
Adam> the data from home and serve it locally.
Adam> It was designed for specifically this sort
> "Esther" == Esther Filderman writes:
Esther> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Chris Reisor wrote:
>> Yes, the reason you haven't noticed us until now is that you probably
>> have a normal-sized bladder. :)
Esther> I have friends who refuse to leave the theater until the IATSE
Esther> lo
Yves> For a site I am working at, we're looking at NAS async
Yves> replication across continents (latency > 100 ms). We've just
Yves> started looking at this, and are right now looking at IBM SONAS,
Yves> HP Ibrix, and Isilon.
How much data are you looking at? And how strict are your
requirement
Yves> Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison
Yves> between those guys, or even one including commercial products?
And include what infrastructure each requires? I'm perenially about
the deploy Cfengine at work, but I keep thinking I should look at
Puppet, BCFG and others.
Adam> Hey all. Does anyone have any experience with Acopia? I've got
Adam> brief and unpleasant knowledge of Rainfinity, but I've never
Adam> worked with Acopia, and I hear it's good stuff for NAS namespace
Adam> virtualization, so I'm curious about any success stories or
Adam> failure stories y
>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Levin writes:
Adam> On Wed, 26 May 2010, John Stoffel wrote:
>> Unless your backup software and your NAS box talk very well together,
>> you're going to be hosed on restores.
Adam> Thanks, John. That's a concern of m
> "Edward" == Edward Ned Harvey writes:
>> From: Todd D. Taft [mailto:t...@unclet.net]
>>
>> Was there any official announcement of this, or are you just looking at
>> the license on the 6.2u6 download page? I don't remember seeing
>> anything about this on the SGE mailing list recently, al
>>>>> "Edward" == Edward Ned Harvey writes:
>> From: John Stoffel [mailto:j...@stoffel.org]
>>
>> If you're looking for another alternative to LSF/SGE, take a look at
>> RTDA's (http://rtda.com) NC job scheduler. They're a small
19 matches
Mail list logo
