> From: discuss-boun...@lopsa.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lopsa.org] On
> Behalf Of John BORIS
>
> I am looking for a Version control system that will fit correctly in my
> environment. I manage a few applications, web sites and a servers. I am
> looking for a version control system that is:
>
>
> From: discuss-boun...@lopsa.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lopsa.org] On
> Behalf Of Trey Harris
>
> assuming you already have SSH access to machines; just set up a
> pseudouser with a restricted login shell to own the repositories and
> give
> your programmers' ssh keys access to that pseudouser's
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
[snip]
> The biggest fundamental difference here, is that git and mercurial are
> decentralized. Svn and perforce are centralized. This means ...
>
> Decentralized version control means each user has their own working copy.
> There is no c
In a message dated Fri, 7 May 2010, Edward Ned Harvey writes:
>> From: discuss-boun...@lopsa.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lopsa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Trey Harris
>>
>> assuming you already have SSH access to machines; just set up a
>> pseudouser with a restricted login shell to own the repositories
Resent, as original got lost in moderation.
John BORIS wrote:
> I am looking for a Version control system that will fit correctly in my
> environment. I manage a few applications, web sites and a servers. I am
> looking for a version control system that is:
>
> 1. Open Source (Free Software)
> 2
Hello Discuss,
I'd appreciate any comments on the following situation:
A large, dual quad-core Intel 5500 CPU system
Storage: 6 2 terabypte drives, in a RAID 1+0 setup. Raid controlled
by controller card. Total available storage is about 5.5 terabytes.
The drives are 7200 RPM
OS drive: 2 16
I have a need to host DNS servers outside our primary data center...
although we have a pretty good data center, we've had a few instances
where our generator failed and DNS being offline is not so great. We
could go out to Slicehost, or other VM/VPS providers and setup bind
ourselves, but I'd rat
Jonathan B Bayer wrote:
> Hello Discuss,
>
> I'd appreciate any comments on the following situation:
>
> A large, dual quad-core Intel 5500 CPU system
>
> Storage: 6 2 terabypte drives, in a RAID 1+0 setup. Raid controlled
> by controller card. Total available storage is about 5.5 terabytes.
> T
Level3 was offering us their "new" hosted and managed DNS service. We weren't
interested, but since I haven't seen
their name associated with DNS before...
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Th
On 10-05-07 02:57 PM, Nick Webb wrote:
> I have a need to host DNS servers outside our primary data center...
> although we have a pretty good data center, we've had a few instances
> where our generator failed and DNS being offline is not so great. We
> could go out to Slicehost, or other VM/VPS
Jonathan B Bayer wrote:
> Hello Discuss,
>
> I'd appreciate any comments on the following situation:
>
> A large, dual quad-core Intel 5500 CPU system
>
> Storage: 6 2 terabypte drives, in a RAID 1+0 setup. Raid controlled
> by controller card. Total available storage is about 5.5 terabytes.
> T
Doug Hughes wrote:
> Jonathan B Bayer wrote:
[snip]
>> Each virtual system will have a relatively small partition to boot
>> from. The data partition (/var) will be accessed via either NFS or
>> CIFS. The exported filesystems will be on the CentOS server, and
>> exported to each individual virtua
Example of the "Master of all trades" that I have been seeing, since the
economic down turn...
--
Location: San Mateo, CA
Area Code: 650
Tax Term: CON_HIRE_CORP CON_HIRE_IND CON_HIRE_W2
Pay Rate: Market
Length: 3-4 Months
Position ID: 945212
Dice ID: hcg
Tr
13 matches
Mail list logo
