=
"If they are the pillars of our community,
We better keep a sharp eye on the roof."
===
- Original Message
> From: John Stoffel
> To: Adam Levin
> Cc: LOPSA Discuss
On Thu, 27 May 2010, John Stoffel wrote:
> Please share!
Absolutely!
> That might work, but the real advantage we perceived was being able to
> get around/away from the 16Tb volume limitations of Netapp, which
> would let us simplify the data paths users used to access stuff, and
> let us grow l
> "Adam" == Adam Levin writes:
Adam> On Wed, 26 May 2010, John Stoffel wrote:
>> Unless your backup software and your NAS box talk very well together,
>> you're going to be hosed on restores.
Adam> Thanks, John. That's a concern of mine as well.
To us, it turned out to be the critical prob
On Wed, 26 May 2010, John Stoffel wrote:
> Unless your backup software and your NAS box talk very well together,
> you're going to be hosed on restores.
Thanks, John. That's a concern of mine as well.
> Now, I will admit this was all a couple of years ago, and it may have
> been fixed or improv
Adam> Hey all. Does anyone have any experience with Acopia? I've got
Adam> brief and unpleasant knowledge of Rainfinity, but I've never
Adam> worked with Acopia, and I hear it's good stuff for NAS namespace
Adam> virtualization, so I'm curious about any success stories or
Adam> failure stories y
Hey all. Does anyone have any experience with Acopia? I've got brief and
unpleasant knowledge of Rainfinity, but I've never worked with Acopia, and
I hear it's good stuff for NAS namespace virtualization, so I'm curious
about any success stories or failure stories you might have.
Thanks,
-Ad
