ality/
--
Regards,
Marco Afonso
http://goo.gl/ZDtQjm
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
], which is
quite clear in the definition of a graduated OSGeo project.
(It is option 1 by your definition below).
[1] http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/project_graduation_checklist.html
On 16/05/2016 3:45 am, Marco Afonso wrote:
Hi all,
Could some answer what is the % of the ponderation
as 241 contributors if we are measuring
> success in these metrics.
> On 15 May 2016 14:40, "Marco Afonso" wrote:
>
>> Hi Anita,
>>
>> Aha! So there is a ponderation weight on software quality evaluation AND
>> project organization evaluation.
>>
it's licence terms, or unlimited at all. :)
Cheers
Em 15/05/2016 13:14, "Anita Graser" escreveu:
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Marco Afonso
> wrote:
>>
>> Once the software (as an object) is available on a public repository, it
>>
gt; Hi Marco and Peter,
>>>
>>> Sorry for my ignorance. However I couldn’t tell the difference between
>>> ancient greek oracle, Bible and modern science. For me, those things
>>> are the same in terms that *The Absolute* should/will be conveyed
>>> thr
Hi Marco and Peter,
>
> Sorry for my ignorance. However I couldn’t tell the difference between
> ancient greek oracle, Bible and modern science. For me, those things are
> the same in terms that *The Absolute* should/will be conveyed through
> *Imperfect* human however the great virtue/
e those are
> though.
>
> Kind regards,
> 신상희
> ---
> Shin, Sanghee
> Gaia3D, Inc. - The GeoSpatial Company
> http://www.gaia3d.com
>
> 2016. 5. 15., 오전 10:44, Marco Afonso 작성:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Software quality is not measured by votes, comunity, marketing
Hi Marc,
Software quality is not measured by votes, comunity, marketing, governance
models, politics, economical interests, hypes or any other social science.
Software quality can be measured using comparison tests from a scientific
and independent methods.
Just to say that some positions sound
Hi all,
Very interesting discussion :)
This is my opinion about general selection methods.
I think it should be:
1. the most independant and impartial as much as possible
2. transparent comunication
3. based on a mathematical expression of general properties
4. the weight of these properties shou
rco,
> Excellent work, you seen lots of improvements over the v1 release.
> Looking forward to work with you again and build a gisvm mapgniter v2
> release.
> Cheers,
> Ricardo Pinho
>
>
>
> Em Quinta-feira, 12 de Novembro de 2015 21:08, Marco Afonso <
> mafonso...
/
Login to backoffice with
u: ad...@isp.com
p: admin
You are all invited to participate, test and submit issues on GitHub. :)
Cheers!
--
Best Regards,
Marco Afonso
http://goo.gl/ZDtQjm
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.o
ate on development.
>
> The more difficult question is whether one or more projects are prepared
> to change their design such that they can integrate together.
>
>
> On 15/11/2012 1:47 PM, Marco Afonso wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> MapIgniter is an open source Geographi
included in OSGeo Live.
--
Regards,
Marco Afonso
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi all,
>From now on, MapIgniter has a place where people can discuss about it.
The Google Group MapIgniter is at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mapigniter
There is a Quick Start topic to receive your feedback. Feel free to post.
Cheers,
Marco Afo
Hello,
My name is Marco Afonso and I'm releasing MapIgniter software.
MapIgniter is an Open Source GeoCMS, based on Postgis, MapServer,
OpenLayers and CodeIgniter. The especial feature is a MapServer GUI.
This is a testing version and please do not consider it as finished. I
would like y
15 matches
Mail list logo
