Are there other members of this discussion list who want to talk about the
special topic described in Aarons mail (look below)?
If there are more than two it would make sense to start a separate group.
Best regards,
Manfred
-Original Message-
From: "Aaron Racicot"
Sent: Friday, Septe
Dear all, thank you for the many contributions to this discussion. Some
background:
If you have not done so, please watch the address by Calvin Metcalf on Proj
[0]. From his reflections and the discussion that ensued it became apparent to
me that presently there is no CRS/projection registry in
Thank you Even,
It's true I was just about to contribute to http://proj4.org/projections/
index.html !
"Is it about having a catalog of spatial reference systems (and all related
information: projections, projection parameters, ellipsoids, datums, prime
meridians, area of use, transformations, e
Thank you Dirk,
I was missing that part from Peter answer.
I fully understand that the solution we want to build need to respect
existing services.
And I wasn't suspect how many registry there was !
Regards,
Julien.
2016-09-02 9:38 GMT+02:00 Dirk Frigne :
> Peter,
> Carl,
>
> Thank you for you
--reply above this line--
Thank you for submitting your ticket to our helpdesk. One of our support gurus
will get back to you with more information shortly. Thank you.
Send Discuss mailing list submissions to
discuss@lists.osgeo.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, vi
Yes... this conversation has kind of morphed.
The projfinder.com idea started as a side project in collaboration with the
cugos.org group. The idea is simple...
Given a dataset with an unknown projection:
1) Have the end user give a "rough estimate" of the geo-location of the
dataset by centeri
Anne & Madi
Thanks for your support on all the administrative tasks to make things
happen.
Vicky
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Anne Ghisla wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> One more GSoC has come to an end, with an awesome array of successful
> student projects:
> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com
?+ 1
Sergio Acosta y Lara
Departamento de Geomática
Dirección Nacional de Topografía
Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas
URUGUAY
(598)29157933 ints. 20329/20330
De: Discuss en nombre de Venkatesh Raghavan
Enviado: viernes, 02 de setiembre de 2016 11:54
Pa
Anne and Madi,
Many thanks for your immaculate management of GSoC 2016.
Congratulations to all students and thanks to mentors for
their time and effort.
Best
Venka
On 9/2/2016 11:27 PM, Anne Ghisla wrote:
Dear all,
One more GSoC has come to an end, with an awesome array of successful
stude
Dear all,
One more GSoC has come to an end, with an awesome array of successful
student projects:
https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/6273632556810240/
We would like to warmly thank our mentors for the first-class support
to the students, defying timezones and language hurdles, so t
Foks,
I read through the emails of this thread and I'm still not sure to understand
what the exact focus would be. It seems it might go beyond the title of this
email thread.
Is it about documentation about projections ? If so, I guess improving proj.4
documentation could be appreciated. There
Peter,
Carl,
Thank you for your valuable input to the discussion,
For me it is clear, as Peter suggests that improvements should be build
on top of what exists, and is carefully validated.
Dirk.
On 2016-09-02 01:45, Carl Reed wrote:
Julien -
The EPSG is what the OGC considers normative. Thi
12 matches
Mail list logo