On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
>> From: ca...@petalphile.com [mailto:ca...@petalphile.com] On Behalf Of
>> carlo
>>
>> I think the 20% rule is a good one, but ultimately I think its best to defer
>> conversations about expected salary (especially if you're still in the
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Stephen Potter wrote:
> On 8/27/2011 6:49 AM, Luke S. Crawford wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:27:03PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>>>
>>> When you're on the market, how do you determine your own value?
>>
>> What I'm getting now plus 20%.
>
> I think,
On 8/27/2011 6:49 AM, Luke S. Crawford wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:27:03PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
When you're on the market, how do you determine your own value?
What I'm getting now plus 20%.
I think, particularly in this day and age, 20% changes in the US market
is pretty m
> From: Tracy Reed [mailto:tr...@ultraviolet.org]
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:45:45PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey spake thusly:
> > I find an approximate salary range up front is worth while for both
sides to
> > know. Because it's a waste of time to go through all the interview
process,
> > only
Well, there's at least two bits here:
1) You want to go through those interviews anyway. Your offer letters is
the most important data-set for determining your market value. You're not
wasting your time.
2) How are you supposed to know what you want until you meet the team? Lets
say it was a s
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:45:45PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey spake thusly:
> I find an approximate salary range up front is worth while for both sides to
> know. Because it's a waste of time to go through all the interview process,
> only to discover it was never possible...
That's fine as long
> From: ca...@petalphile.com [mailto:ca...@petalphile.com] On Behalf Of
> carlo
>
> I think the 20% rule is a good one, but ultimately I think its best to defer
> conversations about expected salary (especially if you're still in the HR/pre-
> screening bit of an interview, and not the technical b
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, carlo wrote:
I think the 20% rule is a good one, but ultimately I think its best to defer
conversations about expected salary (especially if you're still in the
HR/pre-screening bit of an interview, and not the technical bits yet)
because, well, you're just going to low ball
I think the 20% rule is a good one, but ultimately I think its best to defer
conversations about expected salary (especially if you're still in the
HR/pre-screening bit of an interview, and not the technical bits yet)
because, well, you're just going to low ball yourself. Interviewing while
employ
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> I have my own thoughts on this subject, of course, but I'd like to hear what
> you guys say.
>
>
>
> When you're on the market, how do you determine your own value?
The job offers I get are an index to my perceived value.
I start out by
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:27:03PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> I have my own thoughts on this subject, of course, but I'd like to hear what
> you guys say.
>
>
> When you're on the market, how do you determine your own value?
What I'm getting now plus 20%.
Obviously, this means that i
When I've been looking for a job, I've historically asked for something
close to my current salary: Possibly higher if the new job has fewer
perks, or the same or even a little lower if the new job has more (e.g. is
in academia rather than dot-com craziness... hypothetically). But I've had
the good
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>
> When you're on the market, how do you determine your own value?
>
I go to payscale.com and enter my skills, and the offer in hand, then
aim for about 70% of the top value considering where I feel I am
experience wise. It seems to be a
13 matches
Mail list logo
