Re: [lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-19 Thread Joseph Kern
I've always thought that systems in production face a greater threat of protocol and application exploitation rather than what constitutes the bulk of malware that requires user interaction. Viruses and malware on end-user systems require someone to initially run an installer (either wittingly or u

Re: [lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-19 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2013-02-17 at 20:44 +, jrmailgate-lo...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > If you think I'm wrong and I should be running AV software, I'd > appreciate that feedback as well, although I'd be really interested in > understanding why. I'd hesitate to run A/V automatically on all Unix systems. All code has

Re: [lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-17 Thread Paul Graydon
+1 on the OSSEC suggestion. It's remarkable just how many little niggles OSSEC has helped me catch that probably would have gone unnoticed in the logs otherwise. It certainly can take some time to tweak its notifications but it's well worth it. Paul On 02/17/2013 11:12 AM, Ash Palmer wrote

Re: [lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-17 Thread Paul Graydon
On 02/17/2013 04:15 PM, Mark McCullough wrote: On 2013 Feb 17, at 15:44 , jrmailgate-lo...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hi. Would appreciate some views and comments here... We're being pressured by our "Risk and Compliance" group to install antivirus on our Unix (Solaris and AIX) and Linux (Red Hat /

Re: [lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-17 Thread Mark McCullough
On 2013 Feb 17, at 15:44 , jrmailgate-lo...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Hi. > > Would appreciate some views and comments here... > > We're being pressured by our "Risk and Compliance" group to install antivirus > on our Unix (Solaris and AIX) and Linux (Red Hat / Centos) servers. > Historically we'v

Re: [lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-17 Thread Tracy Reed
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:56:30PM PST, Brian Mathis spake thusly: > It's much easier to just install clamav and schedule a scan a few > times a week than it is to argue about this. You're better off This. Additionally, I run AIDE to do file integrity monitoring (FIM) and SELinux in enforcing mo

Re: [lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-17 Thread Ash Palmer
Hello, The method I deploy is a combination of OSSEC and rkhunter. OSSEC is a Host Intrusion Detection System which in some regards could be considered an Anti-Virus utility. I find that OSSEC is very useful for a variety of reasons. "OSSEC is an Open Sourc

Re: [lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-17 Thread Brian Mathis
It's much easier to just install clamav and schedule a scan a few times a week than it is to argue about this. You're better off omitting the fact that clamav is not a real-time scanner. Chances are that the compliance people are just looking to check the box, so make it easy for them to do that.

[lopsa-discuss] Unix/Linux antivirus software

2013-02-17 Thread jrmailgate-lo...@yahoo.co.uk
Hi. Would appreciate some views and comments here... We're being pressured by our "Risk and Compliance" group to install antivirus on our Unix (Solaris and AIX) and Linux (Red Hat / Centos) servers. Historically we've not installed AV software on these platforms because there haven't been viru