Hi folks,
Just a quick reminder we'll be starting in ~40 minutes. I look forward to
seeing you in #lopsa-live.
Aaron
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Aaron Sachs wrote:
> Hello fellow LOPSA Members!
>
> Election time is once again upon us, and your chance to get to know the
> upcoming board ca
Atom, my own experience matches Jerald’s. Trying to determine how to do that
effectively will be tricky. In my own experience it has rarely gotten a
response, and never once produced a change in results. The goal of the
blacklist would be to introduce a cost to their failure.
As I just said to
I’ve been doing this manually for a number of years now.
I’ve even gone as far to look up the organization’s website and find the
highest ranking person I could find and then call for them, saying I’m with
$company (usually mine) and then letting him have it.
The biggest abuse, in my opinion,
This sounds like an interesting project.
Do you intend to report abuse before blacklisting? I suspect that at least
some of the problems could be mitigated simply by reporting the behavior to
the appropriate manager within the recruiter's organization. And if that
doesn't help then it wouldn't be
So the job market is hot hot hot again (at least out here in Silicon Valley /
SF) and we’re back again to the days where “talented recruiters” contact me in
spite of clear statements not to, and concerning jobs with zero match on my
skillset. Their own job experience shows their last job was fli
We had this very discussion as a board as soon as Mike turned in his
resignation. In fact we even talked about changing the bylaws to just
allow all 5 to be elected, but several of us (myself included) are
uncomfortable with changing the rules of an election a matter of weeks
before that electio
I am posting this to the Tech list and also to PLUG and apologize for any
dupes.
I am searching for a Computer Camp that teaches Scratch in the South Jersey
Area that offers it for 7 year olds.. I know this is a bit tight scope but
you gotta ask. I have googled and haven't found any yet.close by,
It's a thing that can be unofficial policy, until someone raises their
discomfort with it. The right thing to do would *eventually* be to
encode it into bylaws, I think, so that you can always fall back on
rules of order, and say that the membership has established that this
is how they want this
That sounds like a great way to solve the problem without a by-laws hack.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Derek Balling wrote:
> Tom,
>
> The by-laws don't allow for it as a part of the official "process".
>
> Nothing in the by-laws, however, stops the board from committing, as the
> board, to s
Tom,
The by-laws don't allow for it as a part of the official "process".
Nothing in the by-laws, however, stops the board from committing, as the board,
to simply appoint the 5-place candidate to the vacancy.
D
On May 7, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Tom Perrine wrote:
> The bylaws may or may not allo
The bylaws may or may not allow for those kinds of election processes.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Willard Dennis wrote:
> Ah, OK. I knew there would be a reason after I sent my message ;)
>
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Derek Balling wrote:
>>
>> You'd want to go through the motions b
11 matches
Mail list logo
