On 3/24/2013 10:21 AM, Charles Polisher wrote:
John Slee wrote:
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I agree with you, and I agree with what I said, that you disagreed
with. ;-) We just have apparently a different perspective on what
you're likely to do in the future
Yes. IME companies are far more like
John Slee wrote:
> Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > I agree with you, and I agree with what I said, that you disagreed
> > with. ;-) We just have apparently a different perspective on what
> > you're likely to do in the future
>
> Yes. IME companies are far more likely to switch applications than to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 00:08:33 -0700
Morgan Blackthorne wrote:
> I'm also curious to know along these lines if anyone has worked with a
> system (either native or with a connector) that will take advantage of
> Amazon's CloudWatch metrics. I could cert
however, and last I worked with Zabbix it seemed to default to not alerting
> unless explicitly configured to do so. (It's been a while since we moved
> away from it, so my memory is a bit foggy. Near as I can recall, a
> configured alarm via a Zabbix agent check would not fire if the agent
> itsel
Hi Morgan,
2013/3/24 Morgan Blackthorne
> This is a spin-off question related to the other monitoring system thread
> we have going, taking it from the general direction towards a specific
> use-case scenario.
>
> I've used several systems throughout the years, the last two notably being
> Nagio
This is a spin-off question related to the other monitoring system thread
we have going, taking it from the general direction towards a specific
use-case scenario.
I've used several systems throughout the years, the last two notably being
Nagios and Zabbix. Nagios seems better suited for monitorin
