-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/10/10 15:01 , Sam Juvonen wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 08:36 AM, Paul Graydon wrote:
>> On 12/10/2010 06:04 AM, Jim Hickstein wrote:
>>> I love xargs. I use it about once a week.
>> Used parallel yet? http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
>
> Oo, perf
2600 just posted there own statement on the wikileaks ddos:
http://www.2600.com/news/view/article/12037
IMHO the issue we should have jumped on: the DHS/ICE confiscation of DNS
names from the 70 web sites during the Thanksgiving holiday.
Did ICANN just hand them over with out so much as court ord
On 12/10/2010 08:36 AM, Paul Graydon wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 06:04 AM, Jim Hickstein wrote:
>> I love xargs. I use it about once a week.
> Used parallel yet? http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
Oo, perfect, hadn't heard about this and was just daydreaming the other
day that somebody *must* have d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/9/10 21:16 , Jan L. Peterson wrote:
> (eval `for m in *.meta; do f=\`awk '/^Filter:/ { print $2; exit }' $m\`; echo
> -n "./$f -r \`basename $m .meta\` |"; done | sed -e "s/|$//"`) < input >
> output
I would use $() instead of `` because the q
(Sorry...just noticed that I only replied back to Matt with this
instead of the whole list[s]...)
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 22:19, Matt Simmons
wrote:
> ...
> We should have media statements ready, identifying typical
> responsibilities (as non-technical and as abstract as possible, like
> 'reliably
On 12/10/2010 06:04 AM, Jim Hickstein wrote:
> On 2010/12/10 01:00, Paul Graydon wrote:
>> You'd still fall foul of dodgy file with special characters, surely?
>>
>> It'd be far better to do find . -name "*.meta" -exec foobar {} \; and
>> know that you're a) not going to suffer a blow up due to t
On 2010/12/10 01:00, Paul Graydon wrote:
> You'd still fall foul of dodgy file with special characters, surely?
>
> It'd be far better to do find . -name "*.meta" -exec foobar {} \; and
> know that you're a) not going to suffer a blow up due to too many files,
> and b) know it's not going to get
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:30 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>
> > On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:01 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
> >> the problem with this is that even though the data has been leaked, that
> >> doesn't mean that it's public domain data. Hosting the data and passing
>
> "Brad" == Brad Knowles writes:
Brad> On Dec 9, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> Just use the shell:
>>
>> for i in *.meta; do echo "something with $i"; done
Brad> Safer, but I believe that still blows up if there are too many
Brad> files that match the expression.
Not in an
