[CentOS] Phantom name server

2024-05-23 Thread Dave Close
t rebooted C8 but I'm prepared if necessary. Is there something else I should do before rebooting C8? Is that even likely to solve the problem? -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359 d...@compata.com dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu "Fairness i

[CentOS] Re: Phantom name server

2024-05-24 Thread Dave Close
d running? Try restarting that. Simon Matter wrote: > Doesn't systemd do some kind of its own name resolution thing these days? > > Maybe someone else can say more about this. Thanks. But nscd is not running. Perusing all the active systemd services, I restarted systemd-resolve

[CentOS] Re: Phantom name server

2024-05-24 Thread Dave Close
ymlink. It contains only a single reference to the local BIND9 and a search statement with one argument. -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA "What right does Congress have to go d...@compata.com, +1 714 434 7359 around making laws just because they dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu

[CentOS] Re: Phantom name server

2024-05-24 Thread Dave Close
NING: .local is reserved for Multicast DNS You are currently testing what happens when an mDNS query is leaked to DNS". So, is it possible that this issue is a result of using ".local" as a pseudo-TLD for the local network? -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA "There is no secu

[CentOS] Re: Phantom name server

2024-05-24 Thread Dave Close
return] resolve dns myhostname /etc/hosts contains only the usual localhost stuff and one entry for a related company with no public name available. "ps -ef" does not reveal any process name containing "dmasq". -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359

[CentOS] Re: Phantom name server

2024-05-24 Thread Dave Close
plified nsswitch.conf to just "host: files dns" and the problem seems to be resolved. (Time will tell.) Changing the TLD will take some time and care but that seems like a good idea. Thanks! -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA "You get whatever accomplishment d...@comp

[CentOS] Re: Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-16 Thread Dave Close
ses and restarted dhcpd." Still, ISC DHCP offers the same old address in response to discover. Where else does it remember that address? -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359 d...@compata.com dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu The most likely way for the

[CentOS] Re: Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-16 Thread Dave Close
t the defined static address. Where is it keeping this old information? What additional change do I need to make to the C6 DHCP server to get it to forget the old address and respond properly to the discover request? -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359

[CentOS] Re: Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-17 Thread Dave Close
dhcpd continues to use; it's what I want it to offer. But it doesn't and continues to offer the old address. -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA "I think there is a world market d...@compata.com, +1 714 434 7359for about five computers." dhcl...@alum

[CentOS] Re: Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-17 Thread Dave Close
request the necessary change. If things start working after that, I'll post a followup. Thanks for all the advice. -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359 d...@compata.com dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu "There are conditions of blindness

[CentOS] Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-04 Thread Dave Close
p tcp -m tcp --dport 901 -j ACCEPT But: $ nmap -sT -p901 localhost PORTSTATE SERVICE 901/tcp closed samba-swat Please tell me what I've missed or give a pointer to better help. -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359 d...@comp

[CentOS] Re: Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-04 Thread Dave Close
UM tells me no such package. Where do you get it? -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359 d...@compata.com dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu "It is well that there is no one without a fault; for he would not have a friend in the wo

[CentOS] Re: Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-04 Thread Dave Close
eady indicated, port 901 is not open. It is not listed in the netstat output, either. But why not? -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA +1 714 434 7359 d...@compata.com dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu "If every conceivable precaution is taken at first, one is

[CentOS] Re: Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-04 Thread Dave Close
Well, when one solution doesn't work, find another. It turns out that there is an SSHFS solution for Windows to connect and I'm working it now. I'm stuck waiting for the customer to enter his password. Maybe this will all be resolved tomorrow. Thanks to all. -- Dave Close, Com

[CentOS] Re: Samba on Centos 6

2025-06-27 Thread Dave Close
. > >I don't manage that device so I'll have to request the necessary change. >If things start working after that, I'll post a followup. Sorry for the delayed followup. Fixing the security device did indeed fix the problem. It was never a problem with the Centos 6 DHCP