Dale R. Worley wrote:
> > From: Dan Ritter
> >
> > Dale R. Worley wrote:
> >> As in the above example, when you set masquerading on interface X,
> >> *which* packets coming from *which* interfaces are masqueraded *how*
> >> going out *which* interface?
> >
> > This is consistent on all NAT syste
> From: Dan Ritter
>
> Dale R. Worley wrote:
>> As in the above example, when you set masquerading on interface X,
>> *which* packets coming from *which* interfaces are masqueraded *how*
>> going out *which* interface?
>
> This is consistent on all NAT systems: masquerading refers to changing
> t
Dale R. Worley wrote:
> > From: Matthew Gillen
> > Subject: [Discuss] firewalld rant
> ...
> > Side note in ambiguous documentation: check out the "masquerade" option
> > https://firewalld.org/documentation/man-pages/firewalld.zone.html :
> >
> From: Matthew Gillen
> Subject: [Discuss] firewalld rant
...
> Side note in ambiguous documentation: check out the "masquerade" option
> https://firewalld.org/documentation/man-pages/firewalld.zone.html :
> ..."If it's present masquerading is enabled.&quo
Matthew Gillen wrote:
> Maybe I'm getting cranky in my old age, but after giving up on my
> manually maintained iptables scripts that were 20 years old and trying
> to build everything in firewalld (and running mostly successfully for a
> couple years), I'm considering going back. I'm writing thi
Maybe I'm getting cranky in my old age, but after giving up on my
manually maintained iptables scripts that were 20 years old and trying
to build everything in firewalld (and running mostly successfully for a
couple years), I'm considering going back. I'm writing this to
hopefully keep you from hu
