On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:46:09 -0700
Kent Borg wrote:
> Just so long as you don't need access to the local version of those
> addresses. (The hotel's gateway to get to the rest of the internet?
> DNS? Room service?)
Exactly. In my case my home network address space is local to the hotel
network a
> On 10/21/24 09:24, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
>> You set a rule that specific IPs be sent out through the VPN virtual
>> interface.
>
> Just so long as you don't need access to the local version of those
> addresses. (The hotel's gateway to get to the rest of the internet? DNS?
> Room service?)
On 10/21/24 09:24, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
You set a rule that specific IPs be sent out through the VPN virtual
interface.
Just so long as you don't need access to the local version of those
addresses. (The hotel's gateway to get to the rest of the internet? DNS?
Room service?)
Maybe us
You can use "rules" to send packets based on a set of rules that will
circumvent the routing table.
You set a rule that specific IPs be sent out through the VPN virtual
interface.
look up "ip rule set"
> I'm traveling a bit this weekend and I ran into some network wonk with
> my Wireguard VPN:
Use a class A address with a class C subnet like
10.11.12.0/24
-- Original Message --
From "Rich Pieri"
To disc...@driftwood.blu.org
Date 10/20/2024 5:37:52 PM
Subject [Discuss] Wireguard and Traveling and Network Overlaps oh my!
I'm traveling a bit this weekend and I ran into some
On 10/20/24 16:02, Rich Pieri wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 18:42:53 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
There's always something, and in this case, you can do something
really weird.
Yup. That is really weird. I'll have to look up network namespaces when
I get home.
If you use someone else's assigned spa
