> ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
>> I have a RPI5 running ZFS, PostgreSQL, a DLNA server, and a full
>> development stack that compiles just about any code I have laying
>> around.
>>
>> These things chave 8 gigs of RAM, 4 CPUs, use 15 watts of power, and
>> cost
>> less than a video card. My desktop
> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:37:20 -0400
> ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
>
>> Would a stack of RPI5s, controlled by some sort of docker look-alike,
>> perform better than a huge VMware server? Would it perform better
>> than a large kubernetes cluster? Would they be more secure because
>> they are physica
On 6/9/24 10:14, Dan Ritter wrote:
RPI - all of them to date - are limited by I/O.
Yes, a serious limitation is their poor bandwidth to RAM. In an Intel
box a lot of effort usually goes into making that high bandwidth.
Servers also support ECC RAM, and even consumer boxes frequently allow
in
On 6/10/24 06:00, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
(AKA most of the time, everything is instantaneous. You only
notice when it isn't.)
Hence finding the XZ exploit :-)
Good point.
-kb
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@driftwood.blu.org
https://driftwood.b
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 13:52:49 -0700
Kent Borg wrote:
> Arm chips are starting to make inroads into real server farms,
> because they offer more performance per watt than do Intel and AMD
> chips, and I suspect also because they can scale their power usage so
> well. But, though they are getting pre
