Hi,
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 11:33:52PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Le 05/11/2015 12:19, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
> > Bottom Line: ensure you are upgraded to at least 4.4.6 or 5.0.0
> >
> > Fixed in LibreOffice 4.4.6/5.0.0
> >
> > CVE-2015-5214 DOC Bookmark Status Memory Corruption
> > h
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 11:01:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 11:33:52PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> > Le 05/11/2015 12:19, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
> > > Bottom Line: ensure you are upgraded to at least 4.4.6 or 5.0.0
> > >
>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 07:58:36AM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
> Is there a plan to move from the LGPL to the GPL for the code base ?
You can't really put all of the code base under GPL; as there are a few public
libraries you should be able to link to even from non-free stuff (extensions
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:04:29AM -0700, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
> listed in the README_en-US file. I'm not familiar with dpgk, though I
Then get. You administer a Debian-based system without knowing dpkg? Oh my.
(Besides that, http://packages.debian.org/libreoffice has a metapackage -
you need at
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 09:03:35AM -0600, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >unsuspecting users to the same problem that OOo has been famous for:
> >there is no obvious way to start to install the files. Dependencies for
dpkg -i *.deb?
> >each .deb have to be met, but nothing indicates the order
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:28:43PM +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> Oh, Wow! What if you're an end user who needs a computer just to do
> work on? Does every Linux user have to be a hard-core geek? And if you
> own a Windows system, should one study for Microsoft certification
> before shelling out you
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:15:25PM +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
> So you'd recommend everybody just running a desktop machine and not
> wanting to get a full featured serveradmin to abhore debian?
No, I want desktop users to know how to use their system. And if they
also administer it they s
friendly, despite what you want to claim.
That graphical tools might make it difficult is no argument.
> On 22/11/10 15:07, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > There is no goddamn need for it. (That Ubuntu people in 90% of cases have
> > no clue how they do basic system tasks doesn't make i
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:50:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:52:41PM +, Lee Hyde wrote:
> > original poster is making. Windows users are presented with a single
> > setup.exe while debian/ubuntu users are presented with a multitude of
> >
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:56:40PM +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> So, I think that any user guide that makes it easier for computer
> illiterates to install a software is always welcome, provided that I
> will not install LibreOffice until is available in a repository that
> I can access via Ubuntu
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 07:34:13PM +0100, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
> From a geeks point of view You are right. But I'm shure that it is not a
> good idea to make all people out there geeks before using a computer or
> using office software ;o)).
Ah, so we should let people not care about t
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 02:55:22AM +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> I am ROFL reading this thread. :-D
You obviously are not thinking about the big picture, otherwise you wouldn't
laugh.
> Rene, I'll write that how-to this week, notably for Ubuntu users, and
> then - if it's OK with you - I'll send y
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 07:12:52PM +, Lee Hyde wrote:
> Is this Debian repository a dedicated LibO repository or does it contain
> other packages? Does it include 64-bit builds of LibO?
Other packages, too, but it also is priorized that way that you need to
explicitly
select what you wan
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:28:54PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> open to learning a *few* new things, it is extremely user friendly.
> There is, however, a segment of the population that actively resists
> learning *anything*.
And that's a problem.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
Unsubscribe instruct
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:21:08AM +, Sveinn í Felli wrote:
> It's quite surreal to see some power users/developers not seeing or
> refusing to see that the whole concept of the software in question
> IS a big metaphor: Office.
Wrong, I do see it.
> And its users are using GUIs and other
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:50:59AM -0600, Sonic4Spuds wrote:
> This is not the case, many people on debian based systems are new to
> linux. Linux Mint and Ubuntu both use debian as their base. These
And those still have to know basics.
Even totally nonsensical beginner documents I find printed i
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:18:21PM -0500, Susan Cragin wrote:
> >On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:52 -0500, Susan Cragin wrote:
> >> LibO_3.3.0rc1_Linux_x86-64 is based on that earlier version that still had
> >> bugs.
> >
> >So, may I ask what the bugs are?
>
> I don't know. I'm not a programmer, nor af
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:07:38PM -, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
> American English need an extension before it can use a British English
> dictionary? Why
> can Thunderbird not share a dictionary with LibO. What about Scribus? MSO
> users are
> used to a shared dictionary across apps.
[ fullquoting for discuss@dfs sake. forgot the CC. Not that it matters
much, but anyways. ]
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > It is a good idea to track changes, but it is p
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:49:51PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> and, possibly, Debian might need to ship an "acceptably free" version
> by their own standards if there were any doubt as to the appropriate
> freeness of the LibreOffice code by the standards of the particular
> distributi
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I am interested to see Rene's input on this as he is part of the
> Debian team.
Thanks, answered both Andrea and Andrew.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 07:13:56PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Besides that, distros will have to continue libreoffice-build, which does
> > > still contain patches.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:57:33AM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I second this as required. I think even Linux but then that will be
> distro specific.
No.
You need root for install, you use the office as user (everything else
is broken), you therefore can't ^auto-update because you don't hav
[ please fix your e-mail quoting ]
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:57:54PM +0100, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
> You also need Admin rights to install under Windows, but that's not the
> point. The point is that the user should be notified that there is a new
> version.
>
> If he or she can install it,
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:50:05AM -0600, Jeremy Cartwright wrote:
> And I see libreoffice has made it into the debian squeeze main contrib
> repositories!
It didn't. It's in experimental only right now.
Will upload it to sid when squeeze is released.
> Would it be prudent, then, to just wai
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:16:34AM -0500, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
> I am not sure the PPA was put together initially by TDF but regardless,
Nope.
> you now have Canonical staff looking into it, and Debian has LibO
> packages in the experimental repository, which to me means everything is
http://
26 matches
Mail list logo
