The links do not lead me to assume that top posting is expected. If the
documentation group desires bottom posting only, the user should be
informed when the register. Even then, I expect that most people will
miss it. Expecting someone to follow a link and then follow another link
seems a we
On 09/09/2011 06:05 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 9/9/11 3:40 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
The links do not lead me to assume that top posting is expected. If the
documentation group desires bottom posting only, the user should be
informed when the register. Even then, I expect that most
On 09/09/2011 10:01 PM, Richard wrote:
Yeah! A man without unnecessary limitations.
Sadly, I have many unnecessary limitations :-)
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discu
On 09/10/2011 07:31 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 9/9/11 11:24 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 09/09/2011 06:05 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Read it many times. I remain unconvinced. Their points assume a single
style of reading email.
I don't think I agree totally. I think their p
On 09/12/2011 11:39 AM, Olivier Hallot wrote:
Hello all
"Error in scripting framework during Basic script execution"
"Message: The following Basic scirpt could not be found"
" bla bla bla, method,
"bla bla bla location"...
Is there a message uglier, scarier,and horrendous as this one above? Not
Oh my, not this again... I should write a plug-in that detects bottom /
top posting and then either:
Filters the type you do not like, or, moves all top / bottom postings to
the bottom / top.
If there is sufficient time to argue this, can someone perhaps stop by
and help me flatten some bo
When folks choose not to follow those rules, the system breaks down
and less gets accomplished.
Just spent the last hour deleting spam, freezing spammer accounts,
disallowing spammer IP addresses on an OOo Forum, come here and see
people still arguing about top or bottom posting
Sorr
I have seen a bunch of discussion related to "get rid of Floppy Disk
because it is antiquated", but I am unclear on the qualifications of the
people making the decisions. Is this just a random opinion one way or
another, or are the participants somehow qualified or familiar with
human factors,
On 08/02/2012 06:56 AM, Mike Hall wrote:
a) Ask those posting an initial message in a thread to put text in the
subject line defining the list before sending it, thus PGP etc would
work again. The disadvantage is that people won't always do it, unless
the list servers check that suitable tex
I was not aware that any list existed that did not use "reply mangling"
so that the reply (by default) went back to the list Will be
interested to see what occurs.
On 08/12/2012 12:26 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
And now I know why I have had so many double responses and then I
was not sure which one I should reply to
:-)
On 08/13/2012 03:14 AM, Tony Pursell wrote:
Florian,
On 13 August 2012 02:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I was not aware that any list existed that did not use "
I do not totally agree Christian details inline...
That said, your summary was easier for me to read than the list...
On 09/27/2012 08:11 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Where's the difference between "General Discussion" & "Lounge" (or
whatever name will be chosen) - it is not clear to me.
On 12/31/2012 02:40 PM, Immanuel Giulea wrote:
In the marketing materials that I am writing covering LO vs AOO, I was
wondering if it would be relevant to go into an explanation about why the
GPL/LGPL licence used by LO was superior to the ASL as a "true open source".
An average user does not c
On 01/01/2013 08:19 PM, Pedro wrote:
Immanuel Giulea wrote
the GPL/LGPL licence used by LO was superior to the ASL as a "true open
source".
Any thoughts on how relevant it would be to extract some of the
information
and apply it on the materials?
Actually it's the other way around. The ASL is
On 01/21/2013 01:34 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 21 January 2013 18:20, Immanuel Giulea wrote:
I know talking about Apache is not one of our main priorities.
But I still wanted to share the news about Lotus Symphony and OpenOffice
merging back after their fork.
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/me
I have not been able to install the final release, but I have a copy of
RC2 installed. I have not yet had significant experience with it, but:
First the bad:
I only found one problem (new bug introduced into the macro language
that prevents a struct from being assigned to a property in anothe
On 02/10/2013 04:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Le 10/02/2013 03:42, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak a écrit :
I have not been able to install the final release, but I have a copy
of RC2 installed. I have not yet had significant experience with it, but:
First the bad:
I only found one problem (new
On 02/10/2013 08:14 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2013/2/10 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
I have not been able to install the final release, but I have a copy of
RC2 installed. I have not yet had significant experience with it, but:
First the bad:
I only found one problem (new bug introduced into the
On 02/10/2013 02:44 PM, Jochen wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 03:42, schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak:
When will 4.0.1 be released?
Hard code freeze & branch libreoffice-4-0-1 Week 8, Feb 18 - Feb
24, 2013
RC1 Week 8, Feb 18 - Feb 24, 2013
RC2 Week 9, Feb 25 - Mar 3, 2013
Release 4
On 02/15/2013 11:10 AM, Keith Curtis wrote:
Hi;
I wrote an article in support of LibreOffice, submitted it to lxer.com, and
it was their top story of the day: http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=3163
Some of what I wrote might be impolitic about a sensitive issue. I'm not
trying to troll this old
My reading of the answers is
1. It depends on how interesting they find the contribution.
2. Some members would vote no because the code is also available under a
more permissive license.
It is clear that if you provide code to AOO, then LO is able to take the
code, but it is not clear that
On 05/15/2013 03:45 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
Any payments and/or donations must be accounted for and if the person
paying has any intent it to go to xyz, then by regulations we may need to
account for that payment/donation and where it went to.
That is the real problem with targeted donations a
On 06/11/2014 05:52 AM, david_lynch wrote:
I sent the message below to the users list. The moderator replied that
I should raise the issues on this list.
>>>>>>>>
In a recent "Macro's in Libre Calc" thread, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak,
an expert on macros, w
On 07/28/2014 07:32 PM, Terrence Enger wrote:
A big downside of Sqlite is its dynamic typing, a.k.a. advisory
typing. IMO, this is simply broken. Terry.
I think that this is intentional, so, I don't think it is actually
broken. I never bothered to investigate the motivation for it.
I find
On 07/29/2014 12:06 AM, Terrence Enger wrote:
With respect to dynamic column typing in SQLite,
On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 20:34 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I think that this is intentional, so, I don't think it is actually
broken. I never bothered to investigate the motivation f
I proposed a talk on OOo / LO and plan to attend. Did not put in much
time on the proposal so not sure if it will be accepted. If something is
happening there, count me in.
On 06/21/2011 02:46 AM, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
Seems to me this thread used to be longer in Nabble 8-0
I am still int
On 06/22/2011 08:18 AM, Fernand Vanrie wrote:
For some reasons the developpers off the OO-API has decided to not
allow sending Emails using there API
I believe that all of these use the command line to send an email
message using an existing client, which then limits the message that can
be s
On 06/21/2011 11:08 AM, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 08:25 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I proposed a talk on OOo / LO and plan to attend. Did not put in much
time on the proposal so not sure if it will be accepted. If something is
happening there, count me in.
No formal
On 06/25/2011 01:14 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Dennis
Le 2011-06-25 12:40, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
PS: Since August 2008, when I became a member of the ODF TC, I don't
recall any conclusion that font embedding is out of scope for the
OpenDocument Format. I don't know what such an assertio
On 06/25/2011 02:09 PM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2011-06-25, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
The problem is that the research I've been doing about this subject has
been leading me to the position that LibO/OOo is not going to implement
it because it must be implemented in ODF, and because ODF won't su
On 07/06/2011 03:45 AM, Robert Derman wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote:
On 5 July 2011 21:58, Robert Derman
wrote:
e-letter wrote:
As far as the request for the ability to download individual
components of LO, this should not be enabled. The whole concept of the
predecessor staroffice product was to
On 07/20/2011 08:15 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Robert Derman wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
e-letter wrote:
It is difficult to understand why a business
would waste time trying to use LO; if a customer uses m$, the supplier
might as well do so also and consider the m$ price as a cost of
conductin
On 07/20/2011 05:02 PM, e-letter wrote:
On the users mailing list, a significant proportion of a random view
of questions seems to be with relation to using LO is some way with m$
document formats.
What should be the priority of LO development: bug-free and excellent
behaviour in native odt form
On 07/21/2011 08:47 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
I am more comfortable in OOo than I am in MSO, so, I have created many
MSO deliverables in OOo and LO. The only time that I make an exception
is when I believe that I am not able to seamlessly move between
On 07/21/2011 09:43 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
On 21/07/2011 14:23, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I am of the opinion that good inter-operability with MSO products
makes it easier to attract new users and that poor inter-operability
with MSO products makes it more difficult.
I quite
On 07/22/2011 10:24 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:47 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
I am more comfortable in OOo than I am in MSO, so, I have created many
MSO deliverables in OOo and LO. The only time
On 07/25/2011 06:40 PM, Sigrid Carrera wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:54:14 -0400
Steven Shelton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/22/2011 7:23 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Even worse, given that MSO has the greatest market share it means that
most legacy
On 07/24/2011 03:48 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 22/07/2011, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
At 02:33 21-7-2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/20/2011 05:02 PM, e-letter wrote:
On the users mailing list, a significant proportion of a random view
of questions seems to be with relation to using
On 07/28/2011 04:54 PM, Olivier Hallot wrote:
Hi
What you say is almost that we should give up on ODF and stick with
Microsoft formats...
I would prefer that LO import MSO format flawlessly but not export them at
all...
Olivier
1. What other file formats should be dropped? All other compet
On 08/11/2011 11:55 AM, e-letter wrote:
Readers,
A recent feature request prompted the strategic question: what is more
important, minimising bugs or adding new features?
Of course, the ideal answer is to do both (;)), but remember, the
question is to choose only one answer...
Short answer: Bu
40 matches
Mail list logo
