Hi Keith,
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 16:16 -0800, Keith Curtis wrote:
> I see how LO is heading in this direction, but you could be
> explicit about it, create more workitems,
There always plenty of work-items and opinions; the only shortage is of
people to work on them. Working code speaks fa
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > That was not what either Florian or the policy said. This is a
> > matter of community, not just of license. Such combinations of
> > licenses do not lead to a contribution being automatically
> > accepted or rejected, either at Apache or at TDF,
Hello,
one of the legal requirements of running a foundation is to send in an
annual report. In fact, it's two reports: One financial report, which
mostly Thorsten takes care of (thanks so much!), and one activity
report, which is mostly on my desk at the moment.
We need to list all activiti
"How could I infer"? Because, as I stated, it was
*specifically* inferred to other entities who subsequently
asked me if I knew the "real" answer.
As such, I specifically asked the 2 controlling bodies of
the 2 projects. I rec'd a responses quickly from AOO, but
none was coming from LO, and theref
I'm with you on the UI design, Keith. The way software looks influences how
people perceive its capability, and LO looks like something from the 90's. I
like your design because it's attractive, yet leaves the menus in place for
those users who can't get into using the ribbon.
Now on the idea o
Since you answered a different question and continue to allege your
question has not been answered, I will ask again:
How could you infer *from any earlier answer* that triple-licensed
contributions would be inherently refused as you allege? Like
Andrew Pitonyak and Jonathon Blake I read exactly t
Hi;
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 16:16 -0800, Keith Curtis wrote:
>> I see how LO is heading in this direction, but you could be
>> explicit about it, create more workitems,
>
> There always plenty of work-items and opinions;
Thank you, everyone who offered help with my macro problem in trying to make a
worksheet that will open another file as a worksheet.
With the live doc link, I found what I think I need and altered the existing
macro to try the Excel way first, then with the help of ON ERROR GOTO, try to
open t
exhaustively, yes, but not concretely. The exhaustive reply
boils down to "it depends", which is really no answer at
all. Furthermore, it implies that the simply inclusion of
the alv2 as part of the license suite *does* change
the dynamic, since something provided under mpl-lgplv3
as not handed the
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> exhaustively, yes, but not concretely. The exhaustive reply
> boils down to "it depends", which is really no answer at
> all. Furthermore, it implies that the simply inclusion of
> the alv2 as part of the license suite *does* change
> the dy
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Charles Jenkins wrote:
> I'm with you on the UI design, Keith. The way software looks influences how
> people perceive its capability, and LO looks like something from the 90's. I
> like your design because it's attractive, yet leaves the menus in place for
> th
Hello Jim,
There's something quite wrong in this conversation. Some entity -a
corporation or a government- has approached you and asked you questions
on how to contribute to LibreOffice (by the way, please be so kind as
using the term "LibreOffice" and not "LO").
As the Chairman of the Apache So
Can someone from TDF confirm Simon's statement. If so, then
I will point people to that email and we'll be done.
On Mar 11, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> exhaustively, yes, but not concretely. The exhaustive reply
> boils
As stated, they contacted me because they had been
told that such licensing was not accepted to BOTH
parties, not just one. This should have been clear
from my 1st post. That is why I asked both parties.
On Mar 11, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
> There's something
Jim,
I do not know who made these assertions to this entity, however it is
really important to understand that it was not the Document
Foundation. We have never been in contact with such parties.
Let me stress again that it is necessary for this entity to contact us
directly.
Thanks,
Charles.
I'm making some progress. Here's my code so far:
==
Public Sub OpenExcelFile(excelPath As String)
Attempt1:
on error goto Fail1
' The Excel method that doesn't work
' under LO, and which I don't own copyright to
exit sub
Fail1:
resume Attempt2
Attempt2:
Hello,
There is one week left to the deadline to apply for GSoC 2013
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013
Are there any plans to send an application for TDF and LibreOffice ?
Immanuel
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? ht
Hi Immanuel,
On 11/03/2013 16:13, Immanuel Giulea wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is one week left to the deadline to apply for GSoC 2013
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013
>
> Are there any plans to send an application for TDF and LibreOffice ?
Information can be found here
Hi Charles, *,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Charles Jenkins wrote:
> dim dummy() ' Empty array of parameters
>
> starDesktop = createUnoService("com.sun.star.frame.Desktop")
> url = ConvertToUrl( ExcelPath )
> doc = starDesktop.loadComponentFromURL( url, "_blank", 0, dummy )
> While working on my wiki page about a new Writer toolbar, I realized
> that independently of my proposal, I believe it makes sense for
> LibreOffice to prefer Python. I see how LO is heading in this
> direction, but you could be explicit about it, create more workitems,
> perhaps track it like yo
> I'm working on a proposal for building an experimental new LibreOffice
> toolbar / UI in Python:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:KeithCu
Err, I would like to point out the fact that trying to emulate MS in any
way is always a B-A-D idea.
Especially, but not limited to GUI ergonomics,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Charles-H. Schulz <
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> I do not know who made these assertions to this entity, however it is
> really important to understand that it was not the Document
> Foundation. We have never been in contact with such pa
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Pedro wrote:
>
> So my question is: is there any reason that LibreOffice under Windows does
> not install to \LibreOffice\?
>
Not really. AFAIK it is just a legacy setting. Default install
location can be changed either from installer UI, or by the
INSTALLLOCATION p
23 matches
Mail list logo
