Le 2012-01-23 02:07, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
- A third option would be to send out a voting invitation to everyone
subscribe to a set of mailing lists (e.g. discuss@, announce@ and so
on), but send them a private token. That way, only active people in
the project could vote, but TDF mem
Marc Paré wrote (24-01-12 10:36)
This third option seems to make the most sense. As you imply, the most
active members would then be included in the vote.
I agree, but of course we say 'active people' here.
As this is a form of filtering of our mailing lists "active"
contributers, we could a
Am 23.01.2012 08:07, schrieb Florian Effenberger:
- Where I'm a bit undetermined is the voting scheme itself
- One option is to allow every subscriber to the announce@ lists to vote
(after e-mail confirmation in the voting system itself),
- another one is to allow only TDF members to vote. The
Hi,
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2012-01-24 10:57:
First when I saw this thread I expected a BoD-vote.
I guess that would be the wrong direction. The conference is for the
communit at large, so the community should decide.
In theory, that means opening up a public link so anyone can vot
Hi Florian,
2012/1/23 Florian Effenberger :
[..]
> - Where I'm a bit undetermined is the voting scheme itself
>
[..]
> - another one is to allow only TDF members to vote. The latter one would
> exclude "joke" votings like we have seen them in the past, but exclude many
> eligible people.
>
This is
Hi,
2012/1/24 Florian Effenberger :
> So, I'd like to find some sensible mechanism to involve as many people as
> possible, without opening the door for misuse of the voting.
>
Just a guess: A minimum of five postings to any of our mailinglists up
to this day?
Volker
--
Volker Merschmann
Membe
Hi,
Volker Merschmann wrote on 2012-01-24 11:06:
- another one is to allow only TDF members to vote. The latter one would
exclude "joke" votings like we have seen them in the past, but exclude many
eligible people.
This is what I would prefer.
I think this would exclude a fair amount of con
Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
the code contributors are not members, but indeed do a very valueable
work. Excluding them from voting sounds wrong.
And it's not logic: the conference is not meant for members onl
On 1/24/12 11:04 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2012-01-24 10:57:
First when I saw this thread I expected a BoD-vote.
I guess that would be the wrong direction. The conference is for the
communit at large, so the community should decide.
In theory, that
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2012-01-24 12:49:
Would this help any facilitating the votes?
http://doodle.com/
maybe, but I am not so keen in having so large votes on an ad-financed
platform. Maybe we can use an own survey system.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Chairman of the Board at
Helli Florian
I'd still go for letting TDF members vote, why would we have the membership
then? :-)
Best,
Charles.
Le 24 janv. 2012 13:09, "Florian Effenberger"
a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2012-01-24 12:49:
>
> Would this help any facilitating the votes?
>>
>> http://doodle.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
Em 24-01-2012 09:03, Cor Nouws escreveu:
> Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
>
>> I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
>> the code contributors are not members, but indeed do a very valueable
>> work
Hi...just a general question as I test LO 3.5: Ever since LoDEV versions of
3.5 I cannot find the general FONT section in "options" for setting the
default
FONT which is easily found in all older versions. Did it move or is it
omitted for
some reason?
I have searched high and low to find thi
Hi Bob,
Robert Boehm wrote (24-01-12 16:06)
Hi...just a general question as I test LO 3.5: Ever since LoDEV versions of
3.5 I cannot find the general FONT section in "options" for setting the
default FONT which is easily found in all older versions.
Did it move or is it omitted for some reason?
Thank-you so much!
Bob
On 01/24/2012 09:19 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Bob,
Robert Boehm wrote (24-01-12 16:06)
Hi...just a general question as I test LO 3.5: Ever since LoDEV
versions of
3.5 I cannot find the general FONT section in "options" for setting the
default FONT which is easily found i
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 12:48 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi All,
>
> Em 24-01-2012 09:03, Cor Nouws escreveu:
> > Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
> >
> >> I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
> >>
Hi,
Am 24.01.2012 14:26, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
> I'd still go for letting TDF members vote, why would we have the
> membership then? :-)
Beeing committed to the project does not necessarily mean to be a
member of the TDF. The event is supposed to be a LibreOffice
Conference rather than a TD
On 24/01/2012 12:03, Cor Nouws wrote:
Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
the code contributors are not members, but indeed do a very valueable
work. Excluding them from voting sounds wrong.
And it's not logic: the
Hi,
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2012-01-24 15:48:
Voting is a measure of traceable membership participation/activity.
Otherwise we can get spammed on untraceable votes to send us where we
don't want LibCon to happen.
by that, we would exclude a large amount of developers, and I am sure
want to ha
Am 24.01.2012 17:11, schrieb sophie:
> On 24/01/2012 12:03, Cor Nouws wrote:
>> Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
>>
>>> I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
>>> the code contributors are not members, but indeed do a very valueable
>>> work. Excluding them
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2012-01-24 15:48:
Voting is a measure of traceable membership participation/activity.
Otherwise we can get spammed on untraceable votes to send us where we
don't want LibCon to happen.
by that, we would exclude a large amount of developer
21 matches
Mail list logo
