Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Moderator problem

2010-11-21 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi James, James Wilde wrote on 2010-11-20 19.31: wilde.ja...@gmail.com I can confirm you are subscribed to all four lists with this address, and I just changed the moderator's address to the above. Florian -- Florian Effenberger Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foun

Re: [tdf-discuss] changed footers of all documentfoundation and libreoffice.org mailing lists

2010-11-21 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi Friedrich, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2010-11-21 02.00: I changed the footers of all documentfoundation.org and libreoffice.org mailinglists according to this one. For I did so by script, please report if you notice funny things ;o)). thanks a lot for all the work! Can you post informa

[tdf-discuss] transform between simplified chinese and traditional chinese

2010-11-21 Thread Jih-Yao Lin
is is possible to include the function to transform between simplified chinese and traditional chinese -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice news published in argentinian newspaper La Nacion

2010-11-21 Thread Anton Meixome
About LibreOffice and TDF in Galicia (Spain), already in september! Codigo Cero, first electronic newspaper in galician especializated in tecnologies. Very popular. http://www.codigocero.com/OpenOffice-org-reorganizase-coma Automatic translation to spanish http://www.xunta.es/tradutor/url.do?tra

Re: [tdf-discuss] changed footers of all documentfoundation and libreoffice.org mailing lists

2010-11-21 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi Florian, *, Florian Effenberger schrieb: >Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2010-11-21 02.00: >> I changed the footers of all documentfoundation.org and >> libreoffice.org mailinglists according to this one. >> For I did so by script, please report if you notice funny things >> ;o)). > thanks a

[tdf-discuss] after beta3

2010-11-21 Thread Jih-Yao Lin
Will beta3 be the last beta version of LO 3.3 ? -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Re: [tdf-discuss] changed footers of all documentfoundation andlibreoffice.org mailing lists

2010-11-21 Thread David Hart
Hi Friedrich, In my opinion, 'All posts to this list are publicly archived and cannot be deleted' looks more professional. The current ' *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***' may convey the wrong image. Regards, David Hart - Original Message - From: "F

Re: [tdf-discuss] New support list suggestion

2010-11-21 Thread Barbara Duprey
On 11/20/2010 7:39 PM, drew wrote: On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 16:55 -0500, Lyle Cochran wrote: > From a promotional perspective, I'd use terminology like "Migrating from Microsoft Office". This provides implicit reinforcement that migrating to LibO from MSO is such a common occurrence that we need

Re: [tdf-discuss] [FAQ] new entries (here: CA/JCA/SCA)

2010-11-21 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 17/11/2010 Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > What do you think of this idea? > http://blog.nooku.org/2010/11/nooku-contributor-agreement/ > (It does not involve copyright). Not involving copyright indeed, it doesn't properly address the issues under discussion. Anyway: - It does something good in ide

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-21 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/19/2010 11:26 PM, Sean White wrote: >why do we still use their version numbering system. If version numbers are very different from those used in OOo, then extensions created for OOo won;t work in LibO, and vice versus. jonathon -BEGIN PGP

[tdf-discuss] Re: About Cacert SSL certificates (was: Feature request for 3.3 still possible?)

2010-11-21 Thread NoOp
On 11/09/2010 03:45 AM, David Nelson wrote: > Hi Guy, :-) > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 18:13, Guy Voets wrote: >> You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to bugs.freedesktop.org, >> but we can't confirm that your connection is secure. >> >> Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites wil

[tdf-discuss] Re: Problems with DEB files

2010-11-21 Thread Sonic4Spuds
On 11/19/2010 06:39 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/18/2010 12:12 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: Andy Brown wrote (18-11-10 20:34) Is anyone besides me having a problem opening the DEB archives for Beta 3? I keep getting an error tar: This does not look like a tar archive. I had the same problem with beta 2. So a

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice should have own "LibreOfficeFont"

2010-11-21 Thread Sonic4Spuds
On 11/20/2010 03:58 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote: "Mateusz Zasuwik" wrote in message news:aanlktin4f7ls=f5cf+mt3ul2koaxtnxb2ko4exf=0...@mail.gmail.com... Hello Early this year FlashCounter published a statistic showed popularity OOo in selected countries. We found out that it had 22% in Poland a

Re: [tdf-discuss] transform between simplified chinese and traditional chinese

2010-11-21 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/21/2010 11:58 AM, Jih-Yao Lin wrote: > is is possible to include the function to transform between simplified > chinese and traditional chinese ">Tools >Language >Chinese Conversion" Radio button is: * Traditional chinese to simplified chinese

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice should have own "LibreOfficeFont"

2010-11-21 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2010 09:58 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote: >If I approved it, why didn't I instead simply say what office suite(s) I had >installed? That functionality is normally used for much less benign searches of your system. >What software looked at my font

Re: [tdf-discuss] Request: Installation Instructions

2010-11-21 Thread Sonic4Spuds
On 11/20/2010 09:03 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:51:00 -0600, Craig A. Eddy wrote: Recently (like 4:00 AM local time, November 20, 2010) I downloaded the .tar.gz of the .deb files from TDF (http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta3/deb/).

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-21 Thread James Wilde
On Nov 21, 2010, at 19:47 , jonathon wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/19/2010 11:26 PM, Sean White wrote: >> why do we still use their version numbering system. > > If version numbers are very different from those used in OOo, then > extensions created for OOo

Re: [tdf-discuss] New support list suggestion

2010-11-21 Thread Charles Marcus
On 11/19/2010 7:16 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > Charles Marcus schrieb: >> I'd really like to see an email support list dedicated solely to >> questions in the nature of "I know how to do this in >> Excel/Word/Powerpoint, but how do I do it on Calc/Writer/Impress?"... > I'd rather like to see thi

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-21 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/21/2010 09:15 PM, James Wilde wrote: > ...and? Is LibO going to upgrade the version number every time OOo does? > And only then? Unless there is a "compatibility tag" for extensions, the way that there is for firefox, LibO is stuck with the

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-21 Thread James Wilde
On Nov 21, 2010, at 22:31 , jonathon wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/21/2010 09:15 PM, James Wilde wrote: > >> ...and? Is LibO going to upgrade the version number every time OOo does? >> And only then? > > Unless there is a "compatibility tag" for extensio

Re: [tdf-discuss] changed footers of all documentfoundation and libreoffice.org mailing lists

2010-11-21 Thread Barbara Duprey
On 11/21/2010 7:37 AM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: Hi Florian, *, Florian Effenberger schrieb: Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2010-11-21 02.00: I changed the footers of all documentfoundation.org and libreoffice.org mailinglists according to this one. For I did so by script, please report if yo

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-21 Thread shundr...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:12 AM, James Wilde wrote: > Well, I appreciate that it would mean two sets of numbers for extensions, > but I can imagine that, in a not too distant future, OOo and LibO are going > to grow apart, possibly sufficiently that an extension for the one will not > work with