Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice Portable

Hi Pedro, I slightly reorder your mail - you wrote: > Exactly. That is something the BoD has to decide. After all the > quality of LibreOffice should be the BoD's main concern IMO... > Quality surely should be a concern to all of us. But I disagree that it should be _the_ overall main concern (i

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice Portable

Pedro schrieb: Hi, I agree with Thorsten and others that too easy access to old versions (what might contain security issues) is risky. But IMHO in the FAQ a "Where can I get old versions" with hints concerning possible risks would be appropriate. CU Rainer -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice Portable

Pedro wrote: > This is something that the BoD needs to decide. If the Lifecycle > has no value, then stop wasting time and resources on maintaining > the previous branch. If it makes sense then don't recommend the > new branch until it reaches x.x.3 > This seems ultimately to be still an issue of

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice Portable

Pedro schrieb: I think that for testing and because of regressions it would be good that the Portable version would match all stable versions of each branch. Hi, I think so, too, no idea why that version is missing. You find a good overview concerning existing Portable versions here:

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice Portable

Pedro wrote: > Better yet, it would be good if the last version of each branch > was kept available at the LO download site. > All old versions are available under http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ - we just don't advertize that widely, they have less features, more bu

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice Portable

Christian you mentioned that the portable version is hosted on the TDF mirror. It can also be found on www.portableapps.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Pedro wrote: > Hi Christian > > > Christian Lohmaier (klammer) wrote > > Only insofar that Portable versions are hosten on our mirror > >