Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-15 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/14/2016 9:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > My "Fix it" comment was aimed at LibreOffice in general, not to you > specifically. Oh, so you prefer to issue 'general purpose' commands and edicts rather than ones aimed at spoecific people. How very thoughtful. > You are one of the people who under

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-12 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/11/2016 6:22 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2016-03-11, 4:11 PM Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: >>> No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice >>> on Macs with your code change. >> *I* broke it? Sorry Larry I'm just a user like you. > It

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Joel Madero
Thanks Bob. You're right. I wish Larry the best of luck as he seeks a better solution for his needs. Happy weekend everyone! Best, Joel On 03/11/2016 05:52 PM, Robert Boehm wrote: > Hi. I just want to say that the whole tone of this conversation was > hostile. I just hope that we can be polite

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Robert Boehm
Hi. I just want to say that the whole tone of this conversation was hostile. I just hope that we can be polite here, even in disagreement. I am not sure what axes anyone here has to grind, but none of it was helpful nor useful. Thanks. Bob On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 19:22 Joel Madero wrote: > Good

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Joel Madero
Good luck moving forward. Hope you find open source software, at no cost to you, that have developers that will act like your employees and do exactly what you want. 13 years in the open source worldI am yet to see such a project. Warmest Regards, Joel On 03/11/2016 05:17 PM, Larry Gusaas w

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Joel Madero
All I said was this isn't the appropriate place to discuss w/e opinions you have. You've gotten a crystal clear answer, your responses are "sure Java has some issues but TDF has a responsibility to offer some hacky solution to work around THEIR bug." We've rejected that proposal (which is pretty ob

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Joel Madero
In shortno. On 03/11/2016 03:49 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2016-03-11, 5:32 PM Joel Madero wrote: >> Please take this off discuss@ list, it belongs at best on dev list, QA >> list, or user listdiscuss list isn't the appropriate place. > Why??? > I am not a developer and don't follow that

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Joel Madero
Please take this off discuss@ list, it belongs at best on dev list, QA list, or user listdiscuss list isn't the appropriate place. You can also report a bug (no clue if you did), it will get closed as NOTOURBUG if it's not our bug. Thanks. Best, Joel On 03/11/2016 03:22 PM, Larry Gusaas wr

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Richard
Seems that from Mac users point of view, there was no bug until LibO fixed their bug and exposed the Mac bug. Wonder who the Mac users will blame? On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > N

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice > on Macs with your code change. *I* broke it? Sorry Larry I'm just a user like you. > It worked before. Past performance is no guarantee o

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Tanstaafl
Why is this thread in the tdf-discuss list? On 3/11/2016 3:28 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > Proof??? JRE works with 5.0 and doesn't work with 5.1. That is pretty > objective proof. > LibreOffice code changed and now does not find JRE on OS X. > > In case you weren't paying attention when 5.1.0 ca

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Joel Madero
> > > Why? Change in LibreOffice code broke it. Nothing to do with Apple. > Proof? Maybe we fixed something that just triggered a bug already in Javado you have some objective proof that this is our bug? -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/11/2016 12:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2016-03-11, 4:18 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote: >> Le 11/03/2016 01:47, Larry Gusaas a écrit : >>> LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime >>> Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 & OS X ver.10.11.3) >>> >>> You need to fix this bug. Can't

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

2016-03-11 Thread Uwe Altmann
Hi Am 11.03.16 um 10:18 schrieb Alexander Thurgood: > Install the JDK instead, it really isn't that hard. A PITA yes, but not > hard. Wow - that helps! Find it here: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk8-downloads-2133151.html -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Uwe Altmann -- T