And now I know why I have had so many double responses and then I
was not sure which one I should reply to
:-)
On 08/13/2012 03:14 AM, Tony Pursell wrote:
Florian,
On 13 August 2012 02:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I was not aware that any list existed that did not use "reply man
2012/8/13 Tony Pursell :
> Florian,
>
> On 13 August 2012 02:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
>>
>> I was not aware that any list existed that did not use "reply mangling" so
>> that the reply (by default) went back to the list Will be interested to
>> see what occurs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/
On 2012-08-12 12:26 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
I know we had numerous discussions on this topic in the past, but the
outcome was that roughly 50% were for this change, and 50% refused it,
so I am really sitting between two chairs here, for which I beg for your
understanding. On the one hand,
Hi,
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2012-08-13 15:21:
- what was the final push to do this change*right now*?
- what were the thoughts to do the change*this way*?
- what was the criteria of balancing the effects between change and no
change (not the ones*this* behaviour or*that* behavi
Hi All,
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote (13-08-12 15:21)
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
changed (so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to e-mai
Hi Florian, *,
Am 12.08.2012 18:26 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
> this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
> changed (so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
> So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
> words, with any e-mail client,
On 13 August 2012 09:58, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 08:14 +0100, Tony Pursell wrote:
> > I will find this a real pain. I use Gmail, which seems to only have
> Reply
> > and Reply to All. There is no Reply to List. So to send this back to
> the
> > list I have to Reply to A
Florian,
On 13 August 2012 02:21, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
> I was not aware that any list existed that did not use "reply mangling" so
> that the reply (by default) went back to the list Will be interested to
> see what occurs.
>
>
>
>
> On 08/12/2012 12:26 PM, Florian Effenberger wr
I was not aware that any list existed that did not use "reply mangling"
so that the reply (by default) went back to the list Will be
interested to see what occurs.
On 08/12/2012 12:26 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called "Reply to mangling" has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to e-mails on the list were
automatically sent direct
10 matches
Mail list logo
