An,
>> Can you please give a try to corosync 2.x? Is performance still bad (on
> 10GbE)?
> If qpid-cpp-server-cluster or qpid-cpp-server-ha plugins could run with
> corosync 2.x, I would like to try it.
>
> Did you ever hear any successful story?
>
I believe qpid migrated to active-passive HA
>Can you please give a try to corosync 2.x? Is performance still bad (on
10GbE)?
If qpid-cpp-server-cluster or qpid-cpp-server-ha plugins could run with
corosync 2.x, I would like to try it.
Did you ever hear any successful story?___
discuss mailing lis
An,
> Hi Friesse,
>
>> Corosync was not tested in 10Gbe environment (with exception of IBA).
> I got corosync run in FDR IB environment by setting transports="rdma" in
> cman's configuration file , and run the same benchmark test, the performance
> is not better than 10Gbe.
>
> Should I cre
