Rich Pieri wrote:
> The only hops that are guaranteed to be encrypted (STARTTLS) are the
> connections from my MUA to my mail server, and from your MUA to your
> mail server. The intervening hops might be encrypted, or they might not
> be encrypted.
I don't see how we're in disagreement here. Natu
On 6/27/2018 1:58 PM, Rich Braun wrote:
> I don't see how we're in disagreement here. Naturally, if you send to
> a listserv like blu.org, there will be multiple hops (most likely but
> not guaranteed to be encrypted). But if you send directly from your
> email to mine, your system will connect to
On 06/25/2018 03:40 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On 6/25/2018 12:07 PM, Rich Braun wrote:
Not mine, at least not in clear-text. Backbone providers only see
encrypted streams between my email server and my service providers'
systems located in France and Canada. I'm not aware of any government
What
So.. it seems the say to filter and save mail to different folders in
the way I was with Procmail, is a Dovecot plugin called Pigeonhole
(https://wiki.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/), which happens to be configurable
in the Sieve language. Integration was pretty trivial, as was
translating Procmail's
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:14:52PM -0400, David Kramer wrote:
> into yet. And I also haven't found how to train spamassassin on spam it
> missed yet in a way that doesn't require ssh access to the server (so my
> wife can do it too).
If you're running spamd, then spamc running remotely can be
pas
On 6/27/2018 3:03 PM, David Kramer wrote:
> I believe very strongly in "Perfection is the enemy of progress". Just
> because I can't completely protect my mail from others doesn't prevent
> me from doing what I can. However, other parties having access to my
It's not about achieving perfection
Yes. The problem is with automating that so I don't have to teach my
wife ssh and command line.
What I have on my old server is a specific folder to dump spam to train
on, and a cron job would feed the mail through spamc. I was hoping
there might be a better way, but I will probably end up a
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:39:23PM -0400, David Kramer wrote:
> Yes. The problem is with automating that so I don't have to teach my wife
> ssh and command line.
> > If you're running spamd, then spamc running remotely can be
> > passed a message along with -L ham/spam/forget, as appropriate.
I
On 6/27/2018 3:39 PM, David Kramer wrote:
> Yes. The problem is with automating that so I don't have to teach my
> wife ssh and command line.
If you're not using a greylist filter then you should. In my experience,
greylisting is much more effective at blocking spam than heuristic filters.
--
On 06/27/2018 03:39 PM, David Kramer wrote:
Yes. The problem is with automating that so I don't have to teach my
wife ssh and command line.
What I have on my old server is a specific folder to dump spam to train
on, and a cron job would feed the mail through spamc. I was hoping
there migh
Rich Pieri still pointed out that I had a "not guarantee" clause:
> But if you send directly from your email to mine, your system will connect to
> easydns (in Canada), which will attempt STARTTLS but not guarantee it...
So? In order for anyone to mount a successful attack on my email stream, the
On 06/27/2018 03:39 PM, discuss-requ...@blu.org wrote:
On 6/27/2018 1:58 PM, Rich Braun wrote:
I don't see how we're in disagreement here. Naturally, if you send to
a listserv like blu.org, there will be multiple hops (most likely but
not guaranteed to be encrypted). But if you send directly fro
On 6/27/2018 4:38 PM, Rich Braun wrote:
> So? In order for anyone to mount a successful attack on my email
> stream, they'd have to first find out that you're one of my
> correspondents and then (somehow) correlate the 1-in-10,000 chance
> that your properly-configured email server fails STARTTLS o
On 6/27/2018 7:05 PM, e...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> I've noticed when e-mail comes into a Comcast address, the sending mail
> server (Yahoo/AOL (when it works), Gmail, mail.com, GMX, etc.), the
> receiving Comcast server receives it with SMTP. But when Comcast sends
> an e-mail out to one of these
On 06/27/2018 07:14 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On 6/27/2018 7:05 PM, e...@linuxmail.org wrote:
I've noticed when e-mail comes into a Comcast address, the sending mail
server (Yahoo/AOL (when it works), Gmail, mail.com, GMX, etc.), the
receiving Comcast server receives it with SMTP. But when Comcas
15 matches
Mail list logo