On Wednesday, 16 April 2025 at 20:08:00 UTC, Arokh Slade wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get debugging on windows 10 to work.
d_test.d
```D
void main() {
int i;
}
```
I compile with:
dmd -g -gf -m64 .\d_test.d
I load the msvc debugger with
devenv /DebugExe .\d_test.exe
latest visualD insta
I am trying to get some items from a list, but `find` gives me
unexpected results.
```
import std.stdio;
import std.algorithm;
int[] x = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3];
void main()
{
auto selection = x.find!(a => a == 2);
foreach(item;selection)
{
writeln(item);
}
}
```
Out
On Friday, 2 May 2025 at 14:33:57 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
Have you tried filter?
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_iteration.html#.filter
Thx. Anyway, what find returns aftrr first occurrence is
unexpected.
On Thursday, 8 May 2025 at 04:51:27 UTC, Andy Valencia wrote:
Thank you. I want to work in strings, so the first one's not
an option. But both the second and third do the trick. Would
you say the to!string would be the most idiomatic? It worked
as "to!string(ctime(&t))", but is it safe to
On Saturday, 10 May 2025 at 11:35:41 UTC, Tim wrote:
This is a known issue. See e.g.
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/18108
Wow, the original issue is 17 years old.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043
At least I know that not my threading stuff is causing this.
Thanks.
Too much code below, but I cannot reduce it more. The issue is in
the main function, I want to pass a delegate to a thread with a
captured value from the surrounding context. At least this was my
expectation, the delegate should capture any stack value.
Am I doing something wrong?
(please ign
On Monday, 12 May 2025 at 08:35:02 UTC, Justin Allen Parrott
wrote:
On Saturday, 10 May 2025 at 04:52:15 UTC, Python wrote:
getchar();
I don’t like this
Poor man's tool to keep my threads running.
On Monday, 12 May 2025 at 07:33:34 UTC, Justin Allen Parrott
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 April 2025 at 20:08:00 UTC, Arokh Slade wrote:
Any tips?
Debuggers phased out in the nineties
Press F12 in your browser. You'll be surprised.
If I am using the integrated Windows Thread Pool (1), how this
will interact with garbage collection? Is there any risk that
some objects are never freed or some are freed too soon? Can the
garbage collector stop the threads as needed?
I am asking that because I cannot use the managed
core.th
