Hello. My problem is exactly what it says on the title: my dmd
(windows 7, x64) doesn't seem to have -fPIC:
---
dmd -fPIC
Error: unrecognized switch '-fPIC'
run `dmd` to print the compiler manual
run `dmd -man` to open browser on manual
---
`dmd --help` also doesn't have anythin
Forgot to say: dmd v2.088.0. Also, weirdly enough, `dmd
--version` outputs `DMD32 D Compiler v2.088.0-dirty`. Why is
"dirty" there?
Hello! See snippet:
---
interface AST
{
static interface Expr : AST
{
final static class Name : Expr
{
override void accept(AST.Visitor v) {
v.visitName(this); }
}
}
final static class Visitor
{
void visitName(AST.Expr.Name name);
On Sunday, 27 October 2019 at 19:54:06 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
It's a bug:
interface A {
interface B : A {
class C : B {
}
}
// Fails: no property 'C' for type 'foo.A.B'
void inside(A.B.C c) { }
}
// Works
void outside(A.B.C c) { }
https://issues.dlang.org/show_
See https://run.dlang.io/is/hNaSFh:
```d
import std.sumtype;
struct Unit {}
alias Option(T) = SumType!(T, Unit);
void foobar(T)(Option!T option) {}
void main() {
foobar(Option!int(123));
}
```
If you run this, the compiler should emit this error:
```d
onlineapp.d(14): Error: template `on
On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 20:18:46 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
This is a long-standing limitation of the D compiler's template
argument deduction: it cannot "see through" `alias` templates
to deduce the underlying type.
Oh, that’s an unfortunate limitation but at least there’s a
workaround.
Hello! Does `__traits(getAttributes, ...)` return UDAs in the
order they were declared in the source code, or is it unspecified?
On Monday, 22 April 2019 at 19:32:27 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 22 April 2019 at 19:02:57 UTC, Emmanuelle wrote:
Hello! Does `__traits(getAttributes, ...)` return UDAs in the
order they were declared in the source code, or is it
unspecified?
I think that is defined:
https://dlang.o
Take a look at this code:
---
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
alias Func = void delegate(int);
int[][] nums = new int[][5];
Func[] funcs;
foreach (x; 0 .. 5) {
funcs ~= (int i) { nums[x] ~= i; };
}
foreach (i, func; funcs) {
func(cast(int) i);
}
On Saturday, 15 June 2019 at 00:30:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 15 June 2019 at 00:24:52 UTC, Emmanuelle wrote:
Is it a compiler bug?
Yup, a very longstanding bug.
You can work around it by wrapping it all in another layer of
function which you immediately call (which is fairly
On Saturday, 15 June 2019 at 16:29:29 UTC, Rémy Mouëza wrote:
I don't know if we can tell this is a compiler bug. The same
behavior happens in Python. The logic being variable `x` is
captured by the closure. That closure's context will contain a
pointer/reference to x. Whenever x is updated out
Hi, I've been reading about DIP25 and DIP1000 and I'm not quite
sure if I understand the difference between the two—is DIP1000
supposed to be a rework of DIP25? And what's the difference
between `return ref` and `return scope`? Also, will there be any
compiler version where `-preview=dip25` and
On Tuesday, 18 June 2019 at 21:57:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
-snip-
Thank you, it's clear to me now :)
Hello!
Is there any trait or Phobos function for transforming a
function/delegate/lambda/whatever's body into a string suitable
for `mixin(...)`? For example:
---
__traits(getBody, (int a, int b) => a + b); // returns "(int a,
int b) => a + b"
// o
On Thursday, 20 June 2019 at 20:38:48 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Thursday, 20 June 2019 at 19:09:11 UTC, Emmanuelle wrote:
Is there any trait or Phobos function for transforming a
function/delegate/lambda/whatever's body into a string
suitable for `mixin(...)`? For example:
See:
https://forum.dlan
On Friday, 21 June 2019 at 15:54:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2019 at 15:42:56 UTC, Emmanuelle wrote:
[...]
This sounds very similar to something I hacked together a while
ago and recently wrote about making cleaner code:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/ekbyseslunvmudkhl...@
16 matches
Mail list logo