On Sunday, 14 August 2022 at 02:30:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Sunday, 14 August 2022 at 02:07:05 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This automatic "combining" of exceptions happens for cleanup
code like scope(exit). (I remember bug(s) for scope(failure).):
To be precise, an exception thrown inside a
From:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/10b9174ddcadac52f6a1ea532deab3310d3a8c03/std/concurrency.d#L1913-L1916:
-
///
final @property bool isClosed() @safe @nogc pure
{
synchronized (m_lock)
{
return m_closed;
}
}
-
I don't understand the purpose of this lock. The
```
C:\dev> rdmd -m64 --eval="import core.stdc.time;
writeln(time_t.sizeof);"
4
```
According to MSDN this should not be the case:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/time-time32-time64?view=vs-2019
time is a wrapper for _time64 and **time_t is, by default,
equiv
On Wednesday, 5 August 2020 at 16:13:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
```
C:\dev> rdmd -m64 --eval="import core.stdc.time;
writeln(time_t.sizeof);"
4
```
According to MSDN this should not be the case:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/time-time32-time64?view=vs-20
On Wednesday, 5 August 2020 at 16:13:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
```
C:\dev> rdmd -m64 --eval="import core.stdc.time;
writeln(time_t.sizeof);"
4
```
According to MSDN this should not be the case:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/time-time32-time64?view=vs-20
-
import std.datetime;
void main ()
{
static time =
SysTime(DateTime.fromISOString("20220101T00")).toUnixTime;
}
-
-
/Library/D/dmd/src/phobos/std/concurrency.d(2574): Error: static
variable lock cannot be read at compile time
/Library/D/dmd/src/phobos/std/concurre
On Friday, 28 August 2020 at 01:54:02 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
-
import std.datetime;
void main ()
{
static time =
SysTime(DateTime.fromISOString("20220101T00")).toUnixTime;
}
-
I think I'm supposed to use MonoTime here, right?
On Friday, 28 August 2020 at 12:35:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
It's trying to look up the local timezone at compile time.
You need to specify a time zone:
static time =
SysTime(DateTime.fromISOString("20220101T00"),
UTC()).toUnixTime;
-Steve
Aw, thanks Steve!
-
import std.range;
import std.stdio;
void main ()
{
auto range = sequence!((a, n) => n);
// works, but the chunks are all the same length
auto rngs = range.chunks(4);
writeln(rngs[0]);
writeln(rngs[1]);
writeln(rngs[2]);
// want this
auto ranges = range.???(
On Monday, 14 September 2020 at 09:08:01 UTC, Seb wrote:
You likely want to get involved / raise your support here:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7600
Oh this is great, thank you!
Or perhaps for any other editor so I could adapt it and have
syntax highlighting in Sublime when viewing .dt files.
On Monday, 22 April 2019 at 04:12:11 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Or perhaps for any other editor so I could adapt it and have
syntax highlighting in Sublime when viewing .dt files.
In the meantime I found this:
https://packagecontrol.io/packages/Pug
It seems to work fairly well.
On 6/5/16, Anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> static Note[0] empty;
>
> Note[] getNotes(string id)
> {
> return (id in store) ? store[id] : empty;
> }
It's likely an accepts-invalid bug, meaning it should be a compiler
error instead. I d
On 6/5/16, Anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Should I report this as a dmd bug then? Not sure where / how to
> do that.
You can report it here: https://issues.dlang.org
> I think I'll just let it go; I was able to work passed it anyway
> using "static Note[] empty;", and `null` works to
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 13:04:00 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
and found that an assert from `std/path.d:3168` (`globMatch`)
contributes a major amount to the running time of dub.
```
assert(balancedParens(pattern, '[', ']', 0));
assert(balancedParens(pattern, '{', '}', 0));
```
Hmm.. tha
I do have (Steinberg) ASIO binding in D.
The problem is I couldn't release the bindings. I've asked Steinberg
if it was OK to release D bindings and they were strongly against it
unfortunately (and this was over 3 years ago..).
Any kind of direct use of ASIO requires their approval first.. meanin
On 6/9/16, Joerg Joergonson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Why would bindings have any issues with licensing?
Just to show that I'm not full of shit, here's the e-mail chain:
On 6/3/11, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently porting the Steinberg VST and ASIO SDKs for use with the
On 4/19/14, Lars T. Kyllingstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Say I have two structs, defined like this:
>
> struct A { /* could contain whatever */ }
>
> struct B { A a; }
>
> My question is, is it now guaranteed that A.sizeof==B.sizeof?
The best thing to do is add a static assert a
On 4/19/14, matovitch via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> This won't compile :
>
> import std.stdio;
>
> void main()
> {
> Test t;
> t.data = [152, 32, 64, 28, 95];
> float b = t.get;
> writefln("%s", b);
> }
Because it's probably overkill. At some point it becomes too much
m
On 4/18/14, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Yeah... "static assert(void.sizeof == 1);" passes :/
Note that you can even have static void arrays. E.g.:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
I'm not sure whether this is an oversight (accepts-invalid) or
something else. But
On 4/22/14, Tim Holzschuh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> What does (inout int = 0) mean/affect here?
This was asked recently, see my reponse here:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.102.1396007039.25518.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com
On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 15:19:55 UTC, Andre wrote:
Is the cast really needed?
It's a known issue and a filed bug report. I don't have the Issue
number at hand though, someone else will likely provide it.
On 4/22/14, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
> I think this can be fixed a
different way.
Feel free to file a bug / make a pull. :>
On 4/24/14, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> *That* creates a conflict though :/
Are you sure? I can't reproduce.
On 4/26/14, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> No. That's expected.
I wonder whether a better diagnostic could help. But then again, maybe
the hiding would be intentional and the diagnostic would be
spurious/invalid. Not sure..
On 4/27/14, Damian Day via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> So I have this procedure.
Have a look at std.exception.assumeWontThrow:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_exception.html#.assumeWontThrow
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 13:52:52 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote:
DMD tells me "Error: variable m cannot be read at compile
time", but why ?
Because 'static foreach' is not an explicit feature yet, so it
depends on the context. When you wrap the trait via:
[__traits(allMembers, MyStruct)]
You'
On 4/28/14, ParticlePeter via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I found the code with parenthesis in the dlang __traits docs and
> also Philippe Sigauds "D Templates", and I haven't seen any other
> example which works without them. So, when to use which syntax (
> for which purpose ) ?
If you need to
On 4/29/14, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The fact that call to base constructor is not inserted into
> templated this()() looks like a bug to me.
Just found this, and it might be related:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5770
On 5/2/14, ref2401 via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> class MyClass {
> Appender!string _stringBuilder;
>
> this() {
> _stringBuilder = Appender!string(null);
> _stringBuilder.clear();
Ouch, ouch, ouch! What's happening is that the 'clear' Appender method
is
On 5/6/14, bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> There is now std.traits.isInstanceOf that could do what you need.
Someone resurrected a thread from 2011. Of course there's isInstanceOf
when I added it myself at the end of 2012.
On 5/24/14, Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Any attempt to set callbacks in GLFW returns a null and the
> callback doesn't work.
>
> The first enforcement fails in this example:
>
> DerelictGLFW3.load ();
> enforce (glfwSetErrorCallback (&error_callback));
It's ok if this fails be
This has been asked so many times, is this info not on the website? We
should have an article on the site explaining this in depth. OT: Sorry for
top-quoting and over-quoting.
On Friday, May 30, 2014, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 30
On Saturday, June 21, 2014, Paul via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> IS there such method get(key, default) for associative arrays, like in
Python?
>
I think it's named getDefault, try that.
On Saturday, June 21, 2014, Paul D Anderson via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Does enum have any effect on functions?
I think that's just a parser bug.
On 7/9/14, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Is it safe to assume that __VERSION__ is the same among DMD, LDC and GDC
> when using the equivalent front-end?
Yes, but not all future compilers might implement this (although I
hope they will). I think there's also __VENDOR__ IIRC.
On 8/29/14, Robin Schroer via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I definitely reload after setting the context and before trying
> to render.
Typically these kinds of errors happen when a null function pointer is
called. I'd add a few checks in some places to see what might have
been left uninitialized
On Nov 5, 2014 12:10 PM, "Bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn" <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> Is there any way to track down access violations, instead of me having to
look through my source code manually.
Whenever you don't get a stack trace on Windows, it's 99% guaranteed you're
calli
On 1/1/15, Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> If I have an associative array and I only modify it's values,
> without changing the keys, can I assume that the order won't
> change?
Associative arrays are not ordered at all.
See the first note here: http://dlang.org/hash-map.html
On 1/1/15, Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The order is unspecified, but an iteration must iterate in *some*
> order. The question (if I've understood it correctly), is whether
> that order of iteration changes when the keys aren't changed.
Hmm yeah, that definitely wasn't ever s
On 1/1/15, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> If you need consistent ordering of values, you probably want a different
> data structure, like an ordered map
This one works nicely on D1, I'd imagine the D2 port works just the same:
https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2/blob/d2port/tango/
On 1/1/15, Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> You could implement an OrderedMap!(Key, Value) via
> RedBlackTree!(Tuple!(Key, Value), (a,b) => a[0] < b[0]).
We could add this as an alias into Phobos or perhaps as just a
documentation line on the website.
On 4/6/15, Jonathan via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> What's the best way to do this? I'm assuming this should be best
> practice:
> http://dlang.org/traits.html#isSame
>
> struct S { }
> writeln(__traits(isSame, S, S));
>
I'm not even sure when or why this trait was introduced, but you could
use
On 8/1/15, DLearner via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> D is a C derivative, so it seems a shame not to identify causes
> of bugs in C,
> and design them out in D.
This has already been done! D defines an array to be a struct with a
pointer and a length. See this article:
http://www.drdobbs.com/arch
44 matches
Mail list logo
