On Wednesday, 9 October 2024 at 16:07:29 UTC, AzuraAkumore wrote:
Im trying to set up a project that i want to compile for both
Windows and Linux. I a on a Linux machine.
When compiling for Linux, the platform I'm on, ldc works no
problem. its only when I specify to compile for windows that it
Im trying to set up a project that i want to compile for both
Windows and Linux. I a on a Linux machine.
When compiling for Linux, the platform I'm on, ldc works no
problem. its only when I specify to compile for windows that it
cant find lld-link. I installed both LDC and DMD via the deb
pac
On Wednesday, 9 October 2024 at 16:07:29 UTC, AzuraAkumore wrote:
Where have i messed up or am I even on the right track?
It seems fine.. the only thing I can think about is misuse of
32/64 bit libs..
I have this notes:
1) Download Windows multilib
2) Install ldc on linux to LDC_PATH/ldc
3)
On Wednesday, 9 October 2024 at 12:12:22 UTC, Salih Dincer wrote:
[...]
```int_fast64_t``` is the fastest 64-bit or larger integer
type. The type that is at least 64 bits long and works fastest
on the platform is selected. This type can be selected if
performance is more important than memory
On Wednesday, 9 October 2024 at 01:16:29 UTC, Boaz Ampleman wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using declarations as type either:
```d
bool doWeWantThat( struct{ int notsure;} p)
{
return false;
}
```
Here `(int notsure) p` would read much better. And we want tuple
syntax in the language anyway
On Tuesday, 8 October 2024 at 15:57:24 UTC, Jared McKinnan wrote:
Hello there,
Just wanted to ask if there's a real difference between e.g.
the "long" type and "int_fast64_t" in terms of execution times.
Thanks
```int_fast64_t``` is the fastest 64-bit or larger integer type.
The type that
