On Friday, 21 February 2020 at 13:42:24 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Mir is great and actually I try to rewrite some Python Pandas
Dataframe index logic.
Maybe mir.series [1] can work for you.
Series!(Key*, Value*) - is a pair of two 1D ndslices, they can be
sorted according to the first one ndslic
On Friday, 21 February 2020 at 13:36:58 UTC, mark wrote:
I thought that onChangeState was never called before the Label
was constructed
That's one of the 'features' (wink wink) of GtkD. It's possible
to call the function as a class function (uninstantiated, in
other words) or as an object fu
We're looking for a way to speed up compilation of template-heavy
code. So we are trying to find out which parts of the code that
is most costly to compile.
Is there a dmd flag that shows the code after template
instantiations has been performed? Or some other dmd flag that
can help out findi
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 11:26:19 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is there a dmd flag that shows the code after template
instantiations has been performed?
The -vcg-ast flag does that.
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 11:26:19 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
We're looking for a way to speed up compilation of
template-heavy code. So we are trying to find out which parts
of the code that is most costly to compile.
Is there a dmd flag that shows the code after template
instantiations
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 11:26:19 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
We're looking for a way to speed up compilation of
template-heavy code. So we are trying to find out which parts
of the code that is most costly to compile.
Is there a dmd flag that shows the code after template
instantiations
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 08:29:32 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Friday, 21 February 2020 at 13:42:24 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Mir is great and actually I try to rewrite some Python Pandas
Dataframe index logic.
Maybe mir.series [1] can work for you.
Series!(Key*, Value*) - is a pair of two 1D ndsl
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 11:53:38 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 11:26:19 UTC, Per Nordlöw
wrote:
Is there a dmd flag that shows the code after template
instantiations has been performed?
The -vcg-ast flag does that.
The d.cg files still contain templates, so it
I'm trying to find information how to port D, especially the D
runtime to a proprietary OS. The OS support seems to be scattered
around several files with a lot version (OS) switches. This makes
kind of hard to understand what you have to implement. Also, what
happens if you only have partial s
What's the fastest linker to use when building using dmd or ldc
on Mac?
My application takes under 1 sec to compiler and 2-3 secs to link.
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 13:20:40 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
I'm trying to find information how to port D, especially the D
runtime to a proprietary OS. The OS support seems to be
scattered around several files with a lot version (OS)
switches. This makes kind of hard to understand what you hav
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 13:20:40 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
Do we have any guide for OS porting?
I'd suggest to first hack the compiler, so that it doesn't
predefine the host OS, but a new version for your OS (and check
whether predefining `version (Posix)` is appropriate or not).
That way,
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 12:24:56 UTC, drathier wrote:
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 11:53:38 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 11:26:19 UTC, Per Nordlöw
wrote:
Is there a dmd flag that shows the code after template
instantiations has been performed?
The -vcg-ast
The following program won't compile if I uncomment the if
statement:
void main()
{
Variant v = complex(1.0, 1.0);
//if (v.peek!(Complex)) {
//writeln("Complex");
//}
writeln(v);
}
I get the same error with v.peek!(complex), which is:
Error: template instance peek!(Comp
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 18:00:16 UTC, Vinay Sajip wrote:
The following program won't compile if I uncomment the if
statement:
void main()
{
Variant v = complex(1.0, 1.0);
//if (v.peek!(Complex)) {
//writeln("Complex");
//}
writeln(v);
}
I get the same error wi
On Saturday, 22 February 2020 at 15:18:09 UTC, kinke wrote:
I'd suggest to first hack the compiler, so that it doesn't
predefine the host OS, but a new version for your OS (and check
whether predefining `version (Posix)` is appropriate or not).
That way, you'll hit static asserts when compili
I don't get how I can create a dynamic array of Cycle buffers of size 2
which use a struct.
struct ms {
int a;
int b;
}
ms[2] msBuffer;
alias circularStructBuffersT = typeof(cycle(msBuffer));
circularStructBuffersT[int] circularStructBuffers;
int i = 2;
auto x = circularStructBuffe
On 2/22/20 2:29 PM, Robert M. Münch wrote:
I don't get how I can create a dynamic array of Cycle buffers of size 2
which use a struct.
struct ms {
int a;
int b;
}
ms[2] msBuffer;
alias circularStructBuffersT = typeof(cycle(msBuffer));
circularStructBuffersT[int] circularStruct
Hi, I've been playing around with having classes allocated on the
stack. I am using the scope keyword for local variables. I
assumed that the scope modifier for function parameters was
designed to prevent these from escaping, but the code below
doesn't show any errors. Is there some newer featu
On 2/22/20 10:01 PM, Russ wrote:
Is there some newer feature I should be using?
scope escapes are only disallowed in @safe code.
Adding @safe: to the top of this file makes it not compile with a complaint:
Error: scope variable z assigned to non-scope b.foo
Which I think is what you expected
On Sunday, 23 February 2020 at 03:26:17 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 2/22/20 10:01 PM, Russ wrote:
Is there some newer feature I should be using?
scope escapes are only disallowed in @safe code.
Adding @safe: to the top of this file makes it not compile with
a complaint:
Error: scop
21 matches
Mail list logo
