(My earlier response seems to be lost; trying one more time.)
On 03/18/2015 12:09 PM, Dmitri Makarov wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:26:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> $ nm b.o | grep transmogrify
>> W _D1c8__T1CTvZ1C12transmogrifyMFNaNbNiNfZi
>
> What compiler do you u
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:26:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
$ nm b.o | grep transmogrify
W _D1c8__T1CTvZ1C12transmogrifyMFNaNbNiNfZi
What compiler do you use? For me, neither a.o nor b.o contain
transmogrify definition:
$ dmd -c -Ix x/i/a.d
$ nm a.o | grep trans
On 03/18/2015 11:03 AM, Dmitri Makarov wrote:
> When these modules compiled separately, I assume, both a.o and b.o
> contain a definition of i.c.S!void.S.transmogrify() instance.
That is very likely but I played with different three files for a while
and failed to see that.
> how is the symbo
I have three modules a.d, b.d, and c.d:
file a.d:```
module i.a;
import i.c, i.b;
final class A {
public:
void foo() {
a.transmogrify();
}
S!void a;
}
```
--
file b.d:```
module i.b;
import i.a, i.c;
class B {
public:
S!void b;
}
```
--
file c.d:```
module
