On Sunday 18 July 2010 19:47:37 strtr wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation!
> But what you are talking about is implementation, nowhere in the spec does
> it say anything like this (or did I just miss it :).
> I could find only this about scope(failure):
> "scope(failure) executes NonEmptyOrScopeBlo
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Sunday 18 July 2010 19:14:11 strtr wrote:
> > I'm not sure whether you missed my point or are simple thinking out loud
> > about unreachable code being a warning.
> > My point was that the unreachable warning was wrong as there i
On Sunday 18 July 2010 19:14:11 strtr wrote:
> I'm not sure whether you missed my point or are simple thinking out loud
> about unreachable code being a warning.
> My point was that the unreachable warning was wrong as there is no
> unreachable code.
Except that there _is_. You just can't see it.
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Sunday 18 July 2010 17:36:58 strtr wrote:
> >
> > I don't agree with this bug report because of two reasons.
> > 1. Warnings are supposed to be warnings, not errors. If you want to see
> > those warnings you'll use -w.
> > What y
On Sunday 18 July 2010 17:36:58 strtr wrote:
>
> I don't agree with this bug report because of two reasons.
> 1. Warnings are supposed to be warnings, not errors. If you want to see
> those warnings you'll use -w.
> What you probably want is for the dmd to have a -!w flag instead (warnings
> by de
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Sunday 18 July 2010 10:59:21 strtr wrote:
> > I totally agree that putting a cast there is probably not really a solution
> > (or legal).
> > Warnings for all non-dchar types.
> > Is there anybody using foreach(c;chars) || foreac
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Sunday 18 July 2010 06:16:09 strtr wrote:
> > I agree with the warning. A good warning would get people to read up on
> > UTF. And if you really want to have char you'll need to cast:
> > foreach(cast(char)c; chars)
> Actually, t
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Saturday 17 July 2010 23:01:28 strtr wrote:
> > >
> > > Cheated? I thought that you were trying to figure out why the code wasn't
> > > d oing
> > > what you expected it to be doing. So, of course I ran it.
> > > Though, it's mor
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Sunday 18 July 2010 04:13:03 bearophile wrote:
> > Jonathan M Davis:
> > > You should pretty much never deal with each individual char or wchar in a
> > > string or wstring. Do the conversion to dchar or dstring if you want to
>
On Saturday 17 July 2010 23:01:28 strtr wrote:
> >
> > Cheated? I thought that you were trying to figure out why the code wasn't
> > d oing
> > what you expected it to be doing. So, of course I ran it.
> > Though, it's more likely that I have an x86 emulator in my brain which
> > can run
> > dmd t
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Saturday 17 July 2010 22:10:07 strtr wrote:
> > == Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> >
> > > On Saturday 17 July 2010 18:59:18 strtr wrote:
> > > > That is [dollar sign, euro sign]
> > > >
> > > > Th
On Saturday 17 July 2010 22:10:07 strtr wrote:
> == Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
>
> > On Saturday 17 July 2010 18:59:18 strtr wrote:
> > > That is [dollar sign, euro sign]
> > >
> > > The reason I post it is because I expected the stash to be 3 lower.
> >
> > We
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Saturday 17 July 2010 18:59:18 strtr wrote:
> > That is [dollar sign, euro sign]
> >
> > The reason I post it is because I expected the stash to be 3 lower.
> Well, if I replace writef with write, I get
> I made $€8.
> If I leave
13 matches
Mail list logo
