On Saturday, November 04, 2017 11:03:52 Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 23:32:52 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > [...]
>
> What's wrong with the introduction of another visibility
> attribute that behave like the C++ private?
>
> Just curious...
Well, if
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 12:43:15 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Visibility modifiers like private, and public are to the module
not the scope.
"Symbols with private visibility can only be accessed from
within the same module."
This is how module based languages work,
Pascal has "strict
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 23:32:52 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
What's wrong with the introduction of another visibility
attribute that behave like the C++ private?
Just curious...
---
Paolo
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:59:20PM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, November 03, 2017 16:32:52 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
> > Perhaps the solution is to go the
> > one-overload-set-per-file route, with std/algorithm/package.d
> > basically impo
On Friday, November 03, 2017 16:32:52 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Perhaps the solution is to go the
> one-overload-set-per-file route, with std/algorithm/package.d basically
> importing everything underneath. :-P
>
> (Shhh, don't tell Andrei, or we'll get another lecture about wa
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:30:21PM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, November 03, 2017 14:52:22 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
[...]
> > Arguably, many of these large flat files ought to be split up into
> > smaller files. For example, std.algorithm
On Friday, November 03, 2017 14:52:22 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:43:55PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On 11/3/17 5:08 PM, Nathan S. wrote:
> > > On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:01:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:43:55PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 11/3/17 5:08 PM, Nathan S. wrote:
> > On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:01:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > > Most folks are surprised by this behavior
> >
> > I found it surprising at first but n
On 11/3/17 5:08 PM, Nathan S. wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:01:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Most folks are surprised by this behavior
I found it surprising at first but now any other way seems absurd to me.
None of the benefits of data encapsulation apply to code written five
li
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:08:56PM +, Nathan S. via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:01:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Most folks are surprised by this behavior
>
> I found it surprising at first but now any other way seems absurd to
> me. None of the benefi
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:01:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Most folks are surprised by this behavior
I found it surprising at first but now any other way seems absurd
to me. None of the benefits of data encapsulation apply to code
written five lines away in the same file.
On Friday, November 03, 2017 13:43:15 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> Visibility modifiers like private, and public are to the module not the
> scope.
>
> "Symbols with private visibility can only be accessed from within the
> same module."
>
> This is how module based languages
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 12:43:15 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Visibility modifiers like private, and public are to the module
not the scope.
"Symbols with private visibility can only be accessed from
within the same module."
This is how module based languages work, a bit more useful th
Visibility modifiers like private, and public are to the module not the
scope.
"Symbols with private visibility can only be accessed from within the
same module."
This is how module based languages work, a bit more useful then to the
scope approach IMO. An easy mistake to make.
https://dla
hello, being new to D i assumed that the private keyword would
work as in C++, but writing this code, i excepted it to throw an
error at compile time, it appear to not doing anything, is there
something i am doing wrong ?
--
import std.stdio;
class Foo
{
private int id = 10;
}
struct
15 matches
Mail list logo
