On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 04:20:27 UTC, Fyodor Ustinov
wrote:
IMHO even if "it is not a bug, it is a feature" - it should not
be compiled without notice.
WBR,
Fyodor.
Agreed, should be a warning at least.
On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 04:11:43 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 03:59:22 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
That's a bug. It should be using the function pointer.
UFCS call should abide by the same scoping rules as anything
else.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug
On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 03:59:22 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
That's a bug. It should be using the function pointer.
UFCS call should abide by the same scoping rules as anything
else.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14161
I thought that's how UFCS was explicitly designed? Gl
On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 03:59:22 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
That's a bug. It should be using the function pointer.
UFCS call should abide by the same scoping rules as anything
else.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14161
Moreover. If the function is not defined (only pointe
On 10/02/2015 4:28 p.m., Fyodor Ustinov wrote:
Hi!
I think this code should not be compiled without any warning:
import std.stdio;
void f(int a) {
writeln("it's a function! : ", a);
}
void main() {
auto f = function (int a) {writeln("It's a variable! : ", a);};
5.f();
f(5)
Hi!
I think this code should not be compiled without any warning:
import std.stdio;
void f(int a) {
writeln("it's a function! : ", a);
}
void main() {
auto f = function (int a) {writeln("It's a variable! : ",
a);};
5.f();
f(5);
}
Output:
it's a function! : 5
It's a variable
