On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 21:30:41 UTC, Etienne wrote:
So, my question inspired a new optimization? :-p
A decent optimizing compiler would detect that the function is
calling itself and save stack space by using register where
possible...
On 2014-08-20 5:25 PM, Ola Fosheim Gr wrote:
Well, I guess simple recursion could be solved easily too by having a
wrapper function that puts the frame pointer in a free callee save
register...
So, my question inspired a new optimization? :-p
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 21:19:18 UTC, Ola Fosheim Gr
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 20:48:38 UTC, Chris
Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 15:17:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Gr
wrote:
Only if it is recursive.
Or if it refers to any state of the parent function.
As
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 20:48:38 UTC, Chris
Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 15:17:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Gr
wrote:
non-static nested functions are effectively delegates as it
needs a context pointer to parent stack frame.
Only if it is recursive.
Or if it refers t
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 15:17:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Gr
wrote:
non-static nested functions are effectively delegates as it
needs a context pointer to parent stack frame.
Only if it is recursive.
Or if it refers to any state of the parent function.
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 14:44:39 UTC, Etienne wrote:
I've been hearing that delegates get a context pointer which
will be allocated on the GC. Is this also true for delegates
which stay in scope?
e.g.
void addThree() {
int val;
void addOne() {
val++;
non-static nested functions are effectively delegates as it
needs a context pointer to parent stack frame.
Only if it is recursive.
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 14:54:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:44:38 -0400
Etienne via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
and this is not delegate, this is just nested function.
non-static nested functions are effectively delegates as it needs
a context
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:44:38 -0400
Etienne via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
and this is not delegate, this is just nested function.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:44:38 -0400
Etienne via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Will the above function allocate on the GC?
no.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I've been hearing that delegates get a context pointer which will be
allocated on the GC. Is this also true for delegates which stay in scope?
e.g.
void addThree() {
int val;
void addOne() {
val++;
}
addOne();
addOne();
ad
11 matches
Mail list logo
