On 12/19/10 06:52, spir wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 03:37:37 -0600
> Christopher Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
>
>> On 12/18/10 07:19, spir wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> I cannot find a way to define methods (I mean "member functions) outside
>>> the main type-definition body:
>>>
>>> struct X {}
>>>
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 03:37:37 -0600
Christopher Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> On 12/18/10 07:19, spir wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I cannot find a way to define methods (I mean "member functions) outside
> > the main type-definition body:
> >
> > struct X {}
> > void X.say () {writeln("I say!");}
On 12/18/10 07:19, spir wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I cannot find a way to define methods (I mean "member functions) outside the
> main type-definition body:
>
> struct X {}
> void X.say () {writeln("I say!");}
> ==>
> Element.d(85): semicolon expected, not '.'
>
> Do I overlook anything, or is this
On Saturday 18 December 2010 05:19:56 spir wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I cannot find a way to define methods (I mean "member functions) outside
> the main type-definition body:
>
> struct X {}
> void X.say () {writeln("I say!");}
> ==>
> Element.d(85): semicolon expected, not '.'
>
> Do I overlook an
spir:
> Do I overlook anything, or is this simply impossible?
Even if you find some trick to do it, it's not the D way. A language syntax is
defined by its conventions too.
Bye,
bearophile
Hello,
I cannot find a way to define methods (I mean "member functions) outside the
main type-definition body:
struct X {}
void X.say () {writeln("I say!");}
==>
Element.d(85): semicolon expected, not '.'
Do I overlook anything, or is this simply impossible? In the latter case, what
is the pr
