On Tuesday, 12 November 2024 at 07:47:58 UTC, Sergey wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2024 at 00:42:41 UTC, Ralph wrote:
Hi there,
I know it is possible to declare an associative array which
takes arrays as values, i.e.
**int[][int] arr;**
A sample of this could be
**arr[2] = [2, 3, 2, 4, 5];**
On Tuesday, 12 November 2024 at 00:42:41 UTC, Ralph wrote:
Hi there,
I know it is possible to declare an associative array which
takes arrays as values, i.e.
**int[][int] arr;**
A sample of this could be
**arr[2] = [2, 3, 2, 4, 5];**
I was wondering if there was a way to have this with sets
Hello,
In your case, the type "set of integers" would be written as
`RedBlackTree!int` in D. Note that it starts with an uppercase R,
and takes the type of values to contain as template argument (the
int after the exclamation mark).
Btw, in the standard library, types always start with an
u
Hi there,
I know it is possible to declare an associative array which takes
arrays as values, i.e.
**int[][int] arr;**
A sample of this could be
**arr[2] = [2, 3, 2, 4, 5];**
I was wondering if there was a way to have this with sets instead
of arrays. In D, sets are equivalent to red-black tr
