On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 11:59:49 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:17:39 UTC, realhet wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 17:13:17 UTC, Anonymouse
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 16:05:58 UTC, realhet wrote:
That looks the closes to the python nam
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 10:17:39 UTC, realhet wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 17:13:17 UTC, Anonymouse
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 16:05:58 UTC, realhet wrote:
The closest I can get is @(S.init.c(9).f(42)) with use of
opDispatch, which is easier to read but still u
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 17:13:17 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 16:05:58 UTC, realhet wrote:
The closest I can get is @(S.init.c(9).f(42)) with use of
opDispatch, which is easier to read but still ugly.
All I can get is that the
- an identifier of a member i
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 16:05:58 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
struct S{int a, b, c=9, d, e, f;}
Is there a way or a trick to declare an UDA by using a nice
struct initializer?
It would be nice to be able to use the form:
@S{f:42} int a; //or something similar to this.
instead of
Hi,
struct S{int a, b, c=9, d, e, f;}
Is there a way or a trick to declare an UDA by using a nice
struct initializer?
It would be nice to be able to use the form:
@S{f:42} int a; //or something similar to this.
instead of this longer and error-prone way:
@S(0, 0, 0, 9, 0, 42) int a;
