On 10/26/2012 06:57 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Hmm. Are the Ubuntu patches incomplete then? I would've thought the
patches in debian/patches should have taken care of this.
I've posted a follow-up to the d.gnu list, since that's really where this
discussion belongs, but just to say you were probabl
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:36:18PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 04:51 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >Hmm. Try apt-get install libppl0.11-dev, maybe? That's where that
> >file should be. AFAIK apt-get build-dep should've pulled that one in,
> >but just in case it didn't, this may
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:15:06 +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
Hello all,
I've just been playing with dirEntries and by the looks of it, it
returns these entries in arbitrary order.
On windows, assuming it was using FindFirstFile or similar you would get
alphabetical order on some
On 10/26/2012 04:51 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Hmm. Try apt-get install libppl0.11-dev, maybe? That's where that file
should be. AFAIK apt-get build-dep should've pulled that one in, but
just in case it didn't, this may help.
It's installed, but the headers in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/ instead
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:50:08AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 02:16 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >Another thing I can think of is, you may need to run 'apt-get
> >build-dep gcc-4.7.2' to install any -dev packages required by the
> >build. That could be what's wrong. Maybe.
>
On 10/26/2012 02:16 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Another thing I can think of is, you may need to run 'apt-get build-dep
gcc-4.7.2' to install any -dev packages required by the build. That
could be what's wrong. Maybe.
Oh, good thought.
Well, I did that, and went with the following configure statemen
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:26:02AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 11:22 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> Yup. Latest gdc-4.7 sources (which I believe include your patch),
> GCC 4.7.2 sources from the Ubuntu 12.10 repositories, tweaked the
> debian/rules.patch file as instructed
On 10/25/2012 11:22 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Oh? Did you run the debian/rules patch command in the package source
directory? That was supposed to have fixed this issue, and potentially
the issue you're seeing below (Debian-based systems break several
assumptions that the GCC build system makese, so
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 10:07 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >No guarantees that it will work, though. The GCC build system is a
> >fragile, sensitive animal.
>
> Indeed ... having followed your instructions (on 64-bit Ubuntu
> 12.10) I fou
On 10/25/2012 10:07 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
No guarantees that it will work, though. The GCC build system is a
fragile, sensitive animal.
Indeed ... having followed your instructions (on 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10) I found
myself first faced with the "cannot find crti.o" I'd encountered before.
I "fi
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:06:12PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
[...]
> That reminds me -- did you tweak the GDC wiki to add the info about
> patching the GCC sources? I must get a working gdc-4.7 on my system.
Yeah I've updated the wiki (http://gdcproject.org/wiki/Installation).
No gua
On 10/25/2012 07:17 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Oh, really? I couldn't reproduce that effect on my system (Debian Linux
64-bit) with dmd (latest git) and gdc (git gdc-4.7 branch). I always get
the same ordering regardless of the compiler I used.
No, I think you're right; I'd been filtering dirEntries
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:22:43PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 02:30 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >This may not be possible if the OS doesn't keep the entries in sorted
> >order (and from what I know, most OS's don't; it's only sorted upon
> >display). *Somebody* will have to d
On 10/25/2012 02:30 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This may not be possible if the OS doesn't keep the entries in sorted
order (and from what I know, most OS's don't; it's only sorted upon
display). *Somebody* will have to do the sorting, whether it's the OS,
or the library or user code. The performance p
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:15:06AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've just been playing with dirEntries and by the looks of it, it
> returns these entries in arbitrary order.
>
> Is there a way to get it to sort the entries in alphabetical order,
> other than the obvious
Hello all,
I've just been playing with dirEntries and by the looks of it, it returns these
entries in arbitrary order.
Is there a way to get it to sort the entries in alphabetical order, other than
the obvious one of storing them in an array and sorting that? (This is
untenable because I'm
16 matches
Mail list logo