On Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 23:04:37 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/10/19 5:12 PM, RazvanN wrote:
On Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 15:04:25 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/8/19 7:54 AM, RazvanN wrote:
[...]
That is a thread-local static destructor. Are any shared
static dest
On 1/10/19 5:12 PM, RazvanN wrote:
On Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 15:04:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/8/19 7:54 AM, RazvanN wrote:
[...]
That is a thread-local static destructor. Are any shared static
destructors accessing the array?
No, there aren't. Indeed, the problem is as
On Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 15:04:25 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/8/19 7:54 AM, RazvanN wrote:
[...]
That is a thread-local static destructor. Are any shared static
destructors accessing the array?
No, there aren't. Indeed, the problem is as Johan as said: the
loadedDSOs shoul
On 1/8/19 7:54 AM, RazvanN wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on issue 14650 [1] and I would like to implement a solution
where static destructors are destroying global variables. However, I
have the following problem in druntime/src/rt/sections_elf_shared:
struct ThreadDSO
{
DSO* _pdso;
On Tuesday, 8 January 2019 at 14:30:24 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 January 2019 at 12:54:11 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
[...]
Great!
(I am _extremely_ surprised that dtors are not called for
globals.)
[...]
Thanks! This is really helpful!
RazvanN
On Tuesday, 8 January 2019 at 12:54:11 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on issue 14650 [1]
Great!
(I am _extremely_ surprised that dtors are not called for
globals.)
and I would like to implement a
solution where static destructors are destroying global
variables. However, I have t
Hi all,
I am working on issue 14650 [1] and I would like to implement a
solution where static destructors are destroying global
variables. However, I have the following problem in
druntime/src/rt/sections_elf_shared:
struct ThreadDSO
{
DSO* _pdso;
static if (_pdso.sizeof == 8) uint _
