Le 17/04/2012 08:40, Russel Winder a écrit :
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:03 +0200, Somedude wrote:
> [...]
>
> Issue 7919
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7919
>
Thanks.
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:03 +0200, Somedude wrote:
[...]
> Did you file a bug report ? If yes, which number ? This is an annoying
> regression in my opinion.
Issue 7919
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7919
--
Russel.
Le 15/04/2012 20:40, Russel Winder a écrit :
> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 16:04 +0200, Artur Skawina wrote:
> [...]
>> (my old GDC needs the explicit "function", no idea if newer
>> frontends still require that)
>
> OK, works for me with GDC as well, DMD is broken! I'll file a bug
> report.
>
Did you
On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 23:36 +0200, Somedude wrote:
[...]
> It works here (DMD 2.058 win32), even without "function".
It also works for me with 2.058 on x86_64 Linux. So the conclusion is
that 2.059 is broken. I'll update the issue I set up for this.
--
Russel.
===
Le 15/04/2012 20:40, Russel Winder a écrit :
> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 16:04 +0200, Artur Skawina wrote:
> [...]
>> (my old GDC needs the explicit "function", no idea if newer
>> frontends still require that)
>
> OK, works for me with GDC as well, DMD is broken! I'll file a bug
> report.
>
It work
On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 16:04 +0200, Artur Skawina wrote:
[...]
> (my old GDC needs the explicit "function", no idea if newer
> frontends still require that)
OK, works for me with GDC as well, DMD is broken! I'll file a bug
report.
--
Russel.
===
On 04/15/12 15:55, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 23:25 +0200, Artur Skawina wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> 'threads' is a (lazy) range;
>>
>>auto threads = array(map ! ( ( int a ) {
>>void delegate ( ) f ( ) {
>> return delegate ( ) { writeln ( a )
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 23:27 +0200, Somedude wrote:
[...]
> This works:
>
> int main ( immutable string[] args ) {
>
> auto threadgroup = new ThreadGroup();
>
> void delegate ( ) f (int a ) {
> return delegate ( ) { writeln ( a ) ; } ;
> }
>
> for ( int n = 0; n < 10; n++ ) {
> t
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 17:10 -0400, Matt Soucy wrote:
[...]
> If you merge the two foreach loops into one, doing t.start();t.join();
> it doesn't have this issue. Also, when I run your code repeatedly the
> number of successful numbers printed changes a lot.
> I'm assuming that you're trying to jo
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 23:25 +0200, Artur Skawina wrote:
[...]
>
> 'threads' is a (lazy) range;
>
>auto threads = array(map ! ( ( int a ) {
>void delegate ( ) f ( ) {
> return delegate ( ) { writeln ( a ) ; } ;
>}
>retu
Le 14/04/2012 18:04, Russel Winder a écrit :
> I thought the following would terminate gracefully having printed 0..9
> in some (random) order:
>
> #! /usr/bin/env rdmd
>
> import std.algorithm ;
> import std.range ;
> import std.stdio ;
> import co
On 04/14/12 18:04, Russel Winder wrote:
> I thought the following would terminate gracefully having printed 0..9
> in some (random) order:
>
> #! /usr/bin/env rdmd
>
> import std.algorithm ;
> import std.range ;
> import std.stdio ;
> import core.th
On 04/14/2012 04:56 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 14-04-2012 18:04, Russel Winder wrote:
I thought the following would terminate gracefully having printed 0..9
in some (random) order:
#! /usr/bin/env rdmd
import std.algorithm ;
import std.range ;
import std.stdio ;
import core.thread ;
in
On 14-04-2012 18:04, Russel Winder wrote:
I thought the following would terminate gracefully having printed 0..9
in some (random) order:
#! /usr/bin/env rdmd
import std.algorithm ;
import std.range ;
import std.stdio ;
import core.thread ;
14 matches
Mail list logo
