On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 18:44:06 Andrew via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> This:
>
> On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 04:08:09 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
> wrote:
> > __gshared char[4] lookup = ['a', 't', 'g', 'c];
>
> Has the same efficiency gain as immutable, so it looks like a
> thread-local vs glob
This:
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 04:08:09 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
__gshared char[4] lookup = ['a', 't', 'g', 'c];
Has the same efficiency gain as immutable, so it looks like a
thread-local vs global difference and the extra cost is going
through the thread-local lookup.
Thanks
On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 03:16:06 Andrew via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I've written a short D program that involves many lookups into a
> static array. When I make the array immutable the program runs
> faster. This must mean that immutable is more than a restriction
> on access, it must a
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 03:16:07 UTC, Andrew wrote:
I've written a short D program that involves many lookups into
a static array. When I make the array immutable the program
runs faster. This must mean that immutable is more than a
restriction on access, it must affect the compiler out
