07-Jan-2013 00:51, Era Scarecrow пишет:
On Thursday, 3 January 2013 at 21:45:24 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
K, I'll likely re-work my multi-level huffman algorithmn and a LZW
compression, although the LZW wouldn't make use of the more exotic
features. Got half the LZW written, but I likely won't g
On Thursday, 3 January 2013 at 21:45:24 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
K, I'll likely re-work my multi-level huffman algorithmn and a
LZW compression, although the LZW wouldn't make use of the more
exotic features. Got half the LZW written, but I likely won't
get this done for a few days.
Nearly
On Thursday, 3 January 2013 at 21:15:19 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
04-Jan-2013 00:11, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Appending a slice *to* BitArray is perfectly fine as in fact
any range of bool (or bit if you like). Any array-like or
string-like container has to support appending a range of
elemen
04-Jan-2013 00:11, Era Scarecrow пишет:
On Thursday, 3 January 2013 at 15:48:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
1/3/2013 2:20 PM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Suddenly it won't work and slicing is only a range and can only be
used in foreach.
No surprise here. Basically container != range over it. It al
On Thursday, 3 January 2013 at 15:48:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
1/3/2013 2:20 PM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Suddenly it won't work and slicing is only a range and can
only be used in foreach.
No surprise here. Basically container != range over it. It all
flows from there. Range doesn't have a
1/3/2013 2:20 PM, Era Scarecrow пишет:
On Thursday, 3 January 2013 at 07:57:46 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
1/3/2013 6:05 AM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Hm, I'd think that having Slice type be:
BitArraySlice{
BitArray* bp;
size_t start, end;
// all else forwards to the pointed array
}
should work
On Thursday, 3 January 2013 at 07:57:46 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
1/3/2013 6:05 AM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Hm, I'd think that having Slice type be:
BitArraySlice{
BitArray* bp;
size_t start, end;
// all else forwards to the pointed array
}
should work avoiding the most of code duplication. W
1/3/2013 6:05 AM, Era Scarecrow пишет:
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 21:00:38 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
12/31/2012 9:35 PM, Era Scarecrow пишет:
Personally I believe that if we introduce a slice of a BitArray as a
separate range type that represents a view of array (but can't be
appended
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 21:00:38 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
12/31/2012 9:35 PM, Era Scarecrow пишет:
Personally I believe that if we introduce a slice of a BitArray
as a separate range type that represents a view of array (but
can't be appended to, etc. it's just a RA range with sli
12/31/2012 9:35 PM, Era Scarecrow пишет:
As BitArray is coming back up and my resumed work I'll comment a few
questions and suggestions and go from there. I'll polish up the code and
try to resubmit it.
Yay!
On Saturday, 28 July 2012 at 21:07:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I would point o
10 matches
Mail list logo
